Charter amendment likely to remain on ballot despite end of EEZ effort

Friday, December 28, 2012 | 6:14 p.m. CST

COLUMBIA — The city's enhanced enterprise zone initiative probably is dead for now, but it appears that a proposed amendment to the city charter that was intended to ease fears that an EEZ would lead to the use of eminent domain will stay on the April 2 ballot.

The City Council voted Nov. 19 to place the amendment on the ballot. All amendments to the city's home rule charter are subject to a public vote.

Sixth Ward Councilwoman Barbara Hoppe proposed the amendment to address concerns that the blight designation required before the state will approve an EEZ might facilitate the city's exercise of eminent domain and the transfer of acquired properties to private developers.  

Mayor Bob McDavid said he understands citizens' concerns about the designations.

"The primary concern was about some mischief happening in Columbia," McDavid said. "But this never really was an issue."

The board of directors of Regional Economic Development Inc. unanimously passed a resolution earlier this month asking the City Council to repeal the ordinance that established the Enhanced Enterprise Advisory Board. The council is scheduled to vote on the repeal at its Jan. 7 meeting.

REDI representatives said at the time that the public had made clear its opposition to EEZs in Columbia.

The debate, as reported in the Missourian, roiled throughout most of 2012. Arguments ensued about whether EEZs might harm property values and whether they would produce any real economic benefits.

Jeremy Root, an attorney and EEZ opponent who is also a member of Citizens Involved in Columbia, or CiViC, said the proposed charter amendment still has merit.

"Protections are appropriate and should be considered by voters," said Root, whom McDavid appointed to a second incarnation of the Enhanced Enterprise Advisory Board.

Third Ward Councilman Gary Kespohl also sees value in keeping the amendment on the ballot.

"I don't know if the EEZ will be brought up again in the future, but if it is, it might be beneficial to have this amendment in place," he said.

Root maintains that even if the amendment passes any future discussions about EEZs should focus on their suitability.

"The question of whether citizens in Columbia need increased protections from eminent domain abuse is separate from whether EEZs are appropriate for Columbia," he said.

Supervising editor is Scott Swafford.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Mike Martin December 29, 2012 | 1:23 p.m.

This amendment should definitely stay on the ballot. It has important local and national significance, and could lead to many other communities doing the same thing.

"The primary concern was about some mischief happening in Columbia," McDavid said. "But this never really was an issue."

Mischief may not be intended by incumbents, but politicians -- and political plans -- constantly change.

We may not need a Charter amendment to protect us from the Mayor McDavids of the world, but there's no telling who will be Mayor in the years to come, or who will be on the Council, or who will be running the town, or what hare-brained plans they might have.

So far, private developers are ahead on the latter two scores. We certainly don't need them further empowered by blight and eminent domain.

(Report Comment)
John Farmer de la Torre December 30, 2012 | 10:35 a.m.

Dear Mr. Martin:

I am the reporter for this story. I will be sure to pass on your comment to those whom I interviewed for this article in case they missed it. Thank you for sharing your view.

John Farmer de la Torre
Columbia Missourian

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.