advertisement

GEORGE KENNEDY: Council still needs to address big questions of city's growth

Friday, January 25, 2013 | 6:00 a.m. CST

Most of the crowd left Tuesday’s City Council meeting once the council had defeated on a tie vote Barbara Hoppe’s attempt to impose a 6-month moratorium on downtown demolitions.

The discussion, first by nearly two dozen citizens and then among council members, had been passionate, even heated. It was well-informed and, I thought, perfectly illustrative of the ongoing debate about Columbia’s future.

Left unanswered were the biggest, most important questions we face. How do we want our city to grow – up or out? What’s the proper balance between preservation and development? Who gets to decide?

The protagonists on the council were the Sixth Ward’s Ms. Hoppe and Mayor Bob McDavid. I thought both were eloquent and persuasive. Each won the support of two colleagues.

Ms. Hoppe’s argument was that the city has, over the past five years, spent more than $200,000 on visioning, the Sasaki plan for downtown and the Charrette that proposed a comprehensive set of objectives for strengthening the city core. A request for proposals from consultants who would rework the zoning code is now being drafted. It would be wise, she said, to halt downtown development long enough to revisit the rules that govern it.

“It’s not just about what comes down; it’s about what goes up,” she said. Recognizing that downtown development is outpacing efforts to regulate it, she added a bit defensively, “We haven’t been sitting on our hands, but we haven’t acted fast enough.”

In fact, although the council has formally adopted the charrette recommendations, nothing visible has been done to implement any of them. (To read them for yourself, go to the city’s website, gocolumbiamo.com, and search for “H3 Charrette.”)

Mayor McDavid focused on the issue that has triggered this civic spasm: the proposed demolition of the old Niedermeyer building and its replacement by a high-rise devoted to student apartments.

“We all want the Niedermeyer to stay, but I don’t own the Niedermeyer,” he said, adding that neither he nor the city has the wherewithal to buy it, either.

He reminded us of the threatened lawsuit if its sale is delayed. Then he moved to the broader issue, how the city grows. When the charrette suggested that 1,050 to 1,250 “mixed-use and mixed-income” housing units be added downtown over 10 years, nobody expected the recent growth of university enrollment — now about 35,000, he pointed out.

So students are suddenly the target market for downtown housing, he said, and better to have them close in than farther out. “I don’t want them driving Rock Quarry Road.”

When the vote came, Fred Schmidt and Michael Trapp agreed with Ms. Hoppe; Daryl Dudley and Gary Kespohl with the mayor. (The Fifth Ward seat is vacant since Helen Anthony’s departure.)

Afterward, I stopped in the hallway outside the council chamber to check in with Donnie Stamper, who had angrily denounced the moratorium on behalf of the developers who employ him. I’ve known Donnie and respected his political insights for a long time.

Tuesday, he surprised me. The whole debate wasn’t really about substance, he said. Instead, the groups opposed to the council’s conservatives were creating a “wedge issue” to use against them in the April election.

As I walked to my pickup in the cold, I thought he’s wrong about the lack of substance but right that the future of downtown will be an issue. The challenging candidates and their supporters were well represented in the chamber. Third Ward challenger Karl Skala even spoke in favor of the moratorium. I’ll be surprised if the Niedermeyer, the moratorium and the bigger questions don’t reverberate through the campaign.

They should. Many of Tuesday’s speakers insisted that the Niedermeyer is only an example of the broad policy issues we need to debate and decide. That’s the substance.

We’ve seen local elections that turned on personality rather than policy. This one promises to be different. Buckle up.

George Kennedy is a former managing editor at the Missourian and professor emeritus at the Missouri School of Journalism. Questions? Contact Opinion editor Elizabeth Conner.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Richard Saunders January 25, 2013 | 2:05 p.m.

"Wedge Issue" = divide and conquer.

Seems to be a LOT of that going on around City Hall these days.

As for the City's "growth?" LOL

When unaccountable people can spend $200k on consultants in order to manufacture consent, it should be obvious that there is no longer any possibility of healthy growth, as they've squandered all the wealth required to sustain it. Instead, they will waste even more resources pursuing one boondoggle after another desperately trying to patch the facade which they base their integrity upon.

The only growth the city, county, state, country, and even the globe will see in this age is the growth of decay.

Politicians are simply NOT equipped to understand, let alone effectively deal with entropy, as they focus only on growth to keep it at bay, having not the slightest clue as to the price they force us all to pay.

Meanwhile, more and more of our wealth is wasted trying to maintain the current scam. It won't work, as it cannot work, given that it is all based upon an ever growing debt to finance it. Sure, the money may be unlimited (being nothing but central bank IOUs), but the resources it can command are not.

Better still, if one looks at the rhetoric surrounding gov. spending (the "fiscal cliff/debt ceiling" debate), the impossibility is magnified by outright lies. How so? It doesn't take a financial genius to observe the sophism by the current administration, where they've taken the line that "not raising the debt ceiling is like not paying your credit card bill..." [ellipses added]

Now, even though I attended a government school, I was still not dumbed down enough to miss noting that in order to be true, the phrase is left unfinished [hence my ellipses]. What's missing? the part about having to get another credit card, in order to get a cash advance, in order to make the payment on the first card. Now, is there anyone who would argue this as a solution to ANYTHING?

As long as decent people allow this criminality to go unchallenged, no amount of "work" by the City Council is going to improve anything.

The Dark Ages are not only returning, but for the exact same reason Rome fell, debasement of the currency to support the theft of society's wealth by the governing class.

Simply put: we cannot afford the inefficient system that surrounds us. That we did for so long, was only due to the ability to print dollars and send the worldwide, where they've mostly remained (i.e. petrodollars). Thing is, the age of the dollar ruling the world is ending due to its debasement, and ALL of those dollars will eventually make there way back home. Once that happens, hyperinflation is practically assured as a given.

Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP) by the Fed might stave off the collapse of the federal government by making debt service costs negligible, but that only increases the speed of collapse of the currency.

So, in light of this, tell me your plans about "growth" again?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements