Candidates for City Council, mayor clash on economic issues at forum

Thursday, March 7, 2013 | 8:20 p.m. CST; updated 10:59 a.m. CDT, Thursday, March 14, 2013
Candidates for mayor and the Fourth and Third Ward City Council seats attend a candidate's forum Thursday afternoon. The forum was sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce.

COLUMBIA — Candidates for the mayoral, Third Ward and Fourth Ward seats discussed city improvement Thursday afternoon at a forum held by the Columbia Chamber of Commerce.

About 50 people listened to the candidates' perspectives on the viability of the Columbia Regional Airport, job creation and the role of economic incentives in attracting businesses. Present were Mayor Bob McDavid and challenger Sid Sullivan, incumbent Third Ward Councilman Gary Kespohl and challenger Karl Skala, and Fourth Ward Councilman Daryl Dudley and challenger Bill Weitkemper.

Fourth Ward candidate Ian Thomas did not attend because of a prior engagement at a conference in Kentucky. His opening remarks were read by forum moderator Kellie Ann Coats, the chamber's chair of MU Health Care, and emphasized the importance of education, traffic demand management and investment in the city's roads.

Columbia Regional Airport

McDavid said infrastructure was the "number one priority for the citizens of Columbia," and highlighted the airport and transit system as examples of projects worthy of investment.

"Make Columbia a fly-into area, not a flyover area," he said.

Sullivan, who ran against McDavid in 2010, said he does not support spending money on the airport until the number of passengers rises.

Currently, 100 people pass through the airport each day, Sullivan said. Until that number reaches 500, he would not increase the airport's funding. He said he would focus on roads and sewers rather than air transportation. 

"We need to move carefully on the airport," he said.

The Fourth Ward candidates had opposing views on the airport's long-term benefits.

Dudley said the difficulty of traveling to Columbia — especially for SEC sports fans — was problematic. He said a superior airport could help the city's economic future.

"Columbia is a growing and viable city, and it needs to have an airport," he said.

But Weitkemper said he was skeptical of spending too many tax dollars on sustaining the structure, adding that an airport of that size had a 90 percent chance of failing.

"There has to be a price on it," he said. "$17 million is unreasonable."

Job creation

McDavid said it was essential to bring a wide variety of jobs to the city, from high-skill positions at MU's nuclear reactor to production jobs requiring a GED. Sullivan said he would seek new strategies for employment through the creation of a job creation advisory committee.

The kinds of jobs that Columbia brings to the community tend to be higher-level, white-collar ones, he said. He would work as mayor to bring more lower-level and entry-level jobs. This kind of creation would also lower poverty in the city, he said.

Kespohl said the way to get people out of poverty is to train them in trade fields so that they are qualified for jobs that require technical skills.

He said he has met with various city officials and a representative from Linn State Technical College to establish a campus in Columbia.

Skala said these efforts must expand beyond post-secondary level positions to include entry-level jobs. Skala referred to a 2009 report detailing plans to promote technical education in Columbia. Concerning the homeless population, he said the city should be able to provide beds and food to those in need in exchange for community service. 

Demolition request moratorium

Candidates were asked to defend their vote — or to explain how they would have voted — on a defeated City Council bill that would have placed a moratorium on issuing demolition permits to downtown property owners.

The three incumbent members of the City Council present at the forum all voted against the bill Jan. 22. At the forum, each candidate cited concerns regarding a potential lawsuit as reason for voting against the measure.

"I left medicine, a great job, because I don't like getting sued," McDavid said. "As mayor of Columbia, I still don't like getting sued."

Kespohl said he also feared a lawsuit. Letters from the attorneys involved in the Niedermeyer property transaction, he said, confirmed those suspicions.

Dudley said he voted against the moratorium "for the simple reason that (the city) did not need to get sued."

Sullivan did not say how he would have voted on the moratorium.

Skala said the Niedermeyer and the abeyance on demolition proposed by Barbara Hoppe are two separate issues. He said he would have voted for the moratorium, and doesn't agree that the moratorium would have resulted in a lawsuit.

Weitkemper said he would not support the moratorium. He said the measure would not have had any effect on the Niedermeyer building.

Economic incentives

McDavid said the incentives that compelled IBM to move to Columbia had paid off, generating $700,000 in tax revenue for the city as well as an additional $400,000 for Boone County and the Columbia School Board, respectively.

He cited the city's 1831 acquisition of MU — a venture he said cost $25,000 per citizen at the time — as a solid investment and, in contrast, described Moberly's failed Mamtek venture as one that was "terribly done."  

"We need to (use incentives) prudently," he said. "We need to do it smartly, and we need to do it to improve the economy of mid-Missouri."

But Sullivan said the the IBM incentives have not yet proven to be worth the money.

IBM does not pay property taxes to the city. And although the company promised to create 600 jobs by the end of 2012, they created closer to 250, he said.

"Columbia needs those resources," he said. "When companies get a tax benefit, residents end up supporting the industry."

Sullivan said that he would work as mayor with the council to create a way to eliminate those incentives over time if the company does not meet the expectations of job creation.

Kespohl said he does not like the idea of incentives, but that Columbia must keep up with other cities that utilize them.

Skala said he voted for the IBM incentives package when he was on the council. He said the deal was a case of a successful incentive proposal, which he would like to see more of in the future.

Dudley said it was necessary to match incentives from other cities to attract business.

"When I ran three years ago, I ran on a platform of jobs and safety," he said. "It’s still about jobs and safety, and incentives are something to use to bring jobs."

He added that the city needed to consider companies already located in Columbia. Weitkemper disagreed, arguing that the use of incentives to attract IBM was an unacceptable use of public money.  

"Was it successful?" he said. "Debatable. It obviously brought in more jobs. Appropriate? No."

Missourian reporters, Elizabeth Pearl, Chris Jasper and Tony Puricelli contributed to this report.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Ellis Smith March 8, 2013 | 12:51 a.m.

There is something everyone - not just the candidates - needs to understand: If we're talking manufacturing, these days we aren't necessarily talking about large numbers of employees.

That once was the case, but not any more. As I noted sometime ago, I can take you to a factory south of Indianapolis, Indiana producing (depending upon the level of business) 12-20 million units of product per year, but staffed by only about three dozen employees. Obviously, such factories are either automated or at least highly mechanized. That, in turn, requires serious capital investment.

Now for the GOOD news. In such factories the employees that do exit are rather well paid. Why? Because, regardless of their level of formal education, each has a special and necessary skill, and when you only have a few employees you can afford to pay them well and still have low labor costs.

Closer to home, Mo Sci Corporation in Rolla, Missouri has something like two dozen employees - counting everyone, including the owners - and does an international business as a custom glass melter. Mo Sci is simultaneously selling both products and technology, since they determine how to formulate glass batches to meet specific customer requirements.

In the past, I've worked in or with factories having anywhere from 200-600+ workers, many of them experienced but not particularly skilled. If you're waiting for something like that to arrive in Columbia, you could wait forever.

(Report Comment)
Sid Sullivan March 8, 2013 | 9:09 a.m.

There are a couple errors in the reporting that distorts my message as a candidate for mayor of Columbia. The article misquotes me when it says I would not support funding the airport until passenger numbers reached 500. "I said I would not support funding the airport until passenger numbers reached some benchmarks showing an increase." I retired from a fortune 100 company and know the value of business. I also know the value of being cautious when making business decisions. I believe the demand for increased use of our airport has to be demonstrated before we invest the $40 or $50 million to improve the airport.

Regarding the economic incentives and IBM, I said "the latest data is not available for IBM jobs but I understood they have achieved or are close to the 600 employees they promised." The second part of this sentence was omitted and the reporter's paraphrase that IBM incentives have not yet proven to be worth the money is a misrepresentation of what I said and does a real disservice to my campaign.

(Report Comment)
Jimmy Bearfield March 8, 2013 | 12:15 p.m.

If you are against incentives for airlines and other companies, you have my vote.

(Report Comment)
Elizabeth Pearl March 8, 2013 | 4:31 p.m.

As one of the reporters who helped on the story, I spoke to Sid Sullivan after he submitted his comments. Based on that conversation, we have decided that no corrections to the story are warranted, but we welcome Mr. Sullivan's clarification of his positions on these issues.

Elizabeth Pearl

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.