Speakers criticize animal feeding practices at Columbia agriculture symposium

Wednesday, April 10, 2013 | 6:00 a.m. CDT

COLUMBIA — Concentrated animal feeding operations, or "factory farms," aren't economically efficient for farmers who operate them and do not actually increase food production, John Ikerd said. The retired MU professor and sustainable agriculture activist spoke Tuesday afternoon at the CAFO — Far from the Farm symposium.

Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) and the issues surrounding their use are the subject of the three-day symposium in Columbia that will continue with events Wednesday and Thursday.

Ikerd was one of four speakers who participated in a panel discussion before an audience of several hundred. A consensus about the inefficiencies of factory farms developed during the two-hour discussion as Ellis Auditorium filled with passionate frustration.

Terry Spence, a hog farmer from Putnam County who served as the moderator for the discussion, said it's important to think about future generations when considering farming practices. "And we should leave the quality just like we’ve had throughout our lifetime,” he said.

Speakers addressed public health risks associated with antibiotic resistance, which they said is being exacerbated by drug use in animals, environmental degradation from concentrated animal waste at factory farms, animal welfare abuse, water pollution and negative economic effects of factory farms on independent, rural farmers.

Factory farms that house 10,000 hogs or 1,000 dairy cows produce the equivalent biological waste of a city with 30,000 to 50,000 people, Ikerd said. 

“CAFOs are a threat to human health. They’re inhumane to animals by the very nature of the system,” he said. “Let’s develop strategies that ultimately lead to doing away with CAFOs." 

The issue has long been a topic of national discussion, but has attracted more attention from young people in recent years. Hundreds of college students attended Tuesday's event.

“People are coming to recognize how important our food choices are and making choices that are just healthful and transparent,” said Gene Baur, an animal welfare activist. “The passion is growing and the sense of injustice and anger about how bad the system has gotten.”

Wes Shoemyer, a former Missouri senator and farmer, implored young people to become involved, identifying them as the source of a potential solution.

“How do we win? It’s going to be you," he said. "We are going to have to have consumers to drive this movement to make a difference. If you care where your food comes from, if you care about how animals are treated and if you care about the future of this country and the wealth distribution and how we are going to build communities, this is an issue that makes a huge difference in Missouri.”

The symposium will continue with another panel discussion Wednesday at 5:30 p.m. at Ragtag Cinema and Thursday with a presentation beginning at 6 p.m. at the Columbia Art League.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Bob Hill April 10, 2013 | 7:56 a.m.

This was not and will not be a 'discussion' of CAFOs, but an indictment. Of course there was a 'consensus about the inefficiencies of factory farms' (which are not a factory but this terminology supports the desired negative imagery) when the deck is stacked. The Missourian should really do a better job of showing both sides of the picture, especially when reporting on a one-sided event most likely arranged to get biased media coverage.

A few points. Large-scale farming like the type being demonized is very efficient. The main cost - financial & social - to raising food animals is feed efficiency. In this matter, large-scale farming wins hands down. There is less manure & waste, less land devoted to raising grains, less fertilizer usage, more trees, fewer small animals like mice & snakes etc. destroyed through the production of row crops and less expensive meat. The latter is especially important for the lower income.

Ask this question. What's the waste produced by raising those animals in smaller, less-efficient farms? The waste number quoted in the article seems impressive, but I it would be even larger for small farms with less efficient conversion of feed-to-meat.

All in all, the carbon footprint of a so-called 'factory farm' is less than the distributive raising of the same number of animals.

(Report Comment)
Matthew Schacht April 10, 2013 | 10:37 a.m.

Hi Bob,

I'm a reporter for the Missourian interested in CAFOs. I didn't write the above story, but I'm glad you chose to comment on it and offer an opposing viewpoint.

You may be wondering what the writer's opinion of CAFOs is...I can only speak for myself. In the spirit of disclosure, I find myself against CAFOs based on limited knowledge. I make this disclosure as a journalist, because I think disclosing can foster conversation if people are willing to change their views.

At the Missourian, we pride ourselves on telling both sides of a story. I hope you'll continue to help us achieve this standard.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.