advertisement

GUEST COMMENTARY: Reducing warfare could limit carnage

Sunday, April 28, 2013 | 6:00 a.m. CDT

It was a confusing week, dominated by the Boston Marathon bombing, the evil act of two young men who had been welcomed into this country and had repaid the kindness with unspeakable cruelty.

Then, for grim comic relief, letters believed to contain the deadly poison ricin were sent to President Barack Obama, a U.S. senator and a local judge. The FBI immediately arrested a serial letter writer in Mississippi who is an Elvis Presley impersonator.

From the very beginning, the Boston Marathon attack smelled like the work of international terrorists — maybe al-Qaeda — rather than a domestic nutjob. Homemade bombs that spew deadly shrapnel have the feel of Iraq and Afghanistan, not Oklahoma City.

But the Boston brothers who authorities believe carried out this outrage — one a U.S. citizen, one who was trying to be — didn’t really match the international terrorist profile. They seemed more like regular immigrants, ethnic Chechens who were struggling to be assimilated into our culture. Until they weren’t. What made them turn so violently against a country that had treated them rather well?

Beats me, although they were not the first homegrown “international terrorists” — mainly Islamic extremists, who have killed or attempted to kill Americans in the name of jihad.

Some say the problem is the way we’ve allowed our “War on Terror” to become a war on Islam, at least in the eyes of many young Muslims who are taking up arms against us. Could be.

Maybe this was their version of giving us “a taste of our own medicine.” Why, after all, should we be exempt from the senseless carnage that is all but universal?

Certainly the Boston attack, hideous as it was, wasn’t terribly exceptional. Only last week, for example, the news contained the story of at least 185 people dead in a Nigerian fishing village in the aftermath of a gunfight between the military and Islamic extremists.

Meanwhile, back in Syria, 80 people died during a government raid.

People in the Middle East, Asia Minor, and North Africa live in constant dread of an imminent attack by their enemies. Sometimes the toll is a few, sometimes a few dozen.

The other day the media showed the photos of a row of dead Afghan children lying on the ground. Or were they Pakistani? They’d been killed in a drone attack. Ours.

There are those who’ve called the Boston bombers “cowards.” I don’t buy that. They were something, but cowardly wasn’t it. The eldest brother apparently launched a suicidal charge at the police who ultimately killed him. Crazy is more like it. There seems to be an epidemic of crazy these days.

Cowardly, it would seem to me, is much more descriptive of killing people with drones — a lethal robot that puts the killer at no risk at all. And when the wrong target is hit or the wrong person killed, it’s written off as “collateral damage.” If that’s not cowardly it’s at least a long way from heroic.

Does that mean I’m in favor of replacing our drones with troops who can go into enemy territory and look our enemies in the eyes before they kill them? By no means. I’m not in favor of putting American troops in harm’s way.

What then? I don’t know, but I think it would help if we didn’t get involved in so many wars. We call ourselves a peace-loving people, but we’ve been involved in wars, invasions and attacks almost constantly for the past hundred years.

There have been one or two brief periods of relative peace in our recent history but not many more. I don’t suggest that we become a nation of pacifists or isolationists, but could we just cut back on warfare a little? Limiting ourselves to one war at a time would be a start.

Donald Kaul is a columnist for Otherwords.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Ellis Smith April 28, 2013 | 7:19 a.m.

This sounds much more like the Donald Kaul I recall, when Kaul was employed by the Des Moines daily "Register" and wrote a column (five days a week) called "Over the Coffee."

As for terrorists being, or not being, cowards, I would nominate Tim McVeigh as being the archtypical example of a terrorist/coward. (We certainly wouldn't nominate a United States President as being a terrorist/coward, would we?)

(Report Comment)
frank christian April 28, 2013 | 10:04 a.m.

Yup! Same old, ultra liberal, nonsensical, Kaul. I wonder what language we'd now be speaking, if we had fought WW2, "one war at a time".

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith April 29, 2013 | 7:25 a.m.

Frank (also J. Karl):

Frank, you've misinterpreted my remark, which is obviously my fault. The Donald Kaul I knew really wasn't a bad guy, and in those days Kaul was well known for his wry humor; I was shocked when I started reading Kaul's more recent stuff, as reproduced in this newspaper.

During his time with the Des Moines Register Donald lived in a big old house in our neighborhood, at the corner of 28th Street and Forrest* Drive; one of Des Moines' older (brick streets) but still "socially acceptable" locations. The neighborhood continues today in a state of gentile decay.

Donald had a few problems with his neighbors, because he was sometimes tardy at having his yard mowed (I doubt that Donald ever pushed or walked behind a lawnmower in his life).

* - Not misspelled; it was the name of a family.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements