WHAT OTHERS SAY: Republicans consistently inconsistent

Sunday, April 28, 2013 | 6:00 a.m. CDT

“Inconsistency is the only thing in which men are consistent.”

— Horace Smith, poet and novelist

Some Republican lawmakers are consistently inconsistent when it comes to photography.

On the issue of voter identification, Republicans largely support photo ID requirements to prevent voter fraud.

On the issue of biometric analysis of driver’s license photos to prevent fraud, however, they oppose the process as an invasion of privacy.

Public concerns about privacy also seem inconsistent, with people voluntarily sacrificing privacy through social media, while insisting government guard their privacy. That, however, is a topic for another time.

The voter ID issue before the state legislature largely is supported by Republicans and opposed by Democrats.

GOP lawmakers base their support on preventing fraud. State Rep. Stanley Cox, R-Sedalia, said during a March hearing “... if you go to vote on Election Day and have to prove who you are, we’ll have more integrity in the process.”

Democrats counter that voter fraud has not been an issue in Missouri. They contend GOP opposition is designed to impede low-income people, who largely vote Democratic.

In view of the GOP interest in photo identification as a crime prevention measure, their opposition to biometric analysis seems curiously inconsistent.

The analysis would match photos of driver’s license applicants with thousands of photos in a database to determine if the applicant is attempting to create false or multiple identities.

Sen. Will Kraus, R-Lee’s Summit, voiced fears that biometric analysis of driver’s license photos could be misused or abused by an over-reaching government.

And Rep. Todd Richardson, R-Poplar Bluff, said: “I don’t want to live in an America where in the name of security we’ve completely destroyed privacy, and I think we’re approaching that line with things like biometric analysis and photo validation.”

The Republican party line approves of voter ID to prevent fraud but rejects biometric analysis of driver’s license photos to prevent fraud.

That’s a consistent inconsistency.

Copyright Jefferson City News Tribune. Reprinted with permission.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.