WHAT OTHERS SAY: Who do our legislators represent?

Thursday, May 2, 2013 | 6:00 a.m. CDT

Republicans in the Missouri General Assembly handed Gov. Jay Nixon, a Democrat, a defeat on the Medicaid expansion issue. It not only was a defeat for the governor, but for the people. It also was a blow to Mercy Hospital Washington and to all hospitals in Missouri.

Of course, the people who would have been helped with their health conditions also were dealt a blow.

We are especially concerned about our local representatives in the legislature, all Republicans, and their negative attitudes. Did they know what this was going to do to Mercy Hospital Washington? They were informed of the impact by personal visits by representatives of the hospital with our local House and Senate members. They still went along with the Republican Party in killing the legislation. Vote the party line is what they did regardless of what it is going to mean for hospitals, which already are providing millions and millions of dollars in charity care.

Who do these Republicans represent? Certainly it isn't Mercy Hospital Washington and the people the hospital serves!

Their main motive was to slam Obamacare. The Medicaid expansion program is part of that program. We don't care much about Obamacare, but it is the law of the land. There are elements of good in the plan, and the Medicaid provision is one of them. The rejection of Medicaid expansion by Missouri lawmakers is a $4 billion loss for the state.

At a recent meeting of the Community Ambassadors Committee, Mercy officials explained the loss to Mercy Hospital Washington. For the period 2013 to 2019, the cuts to Mercy Hospital Washington will be $2.8 million from the Medicare sequestration program; an $11.4 million cut from ACA Medicare payments; and a $9.7 million cut from the ACA Medicaid DSH payments.

Our elected Republican House and Senate members need to be held accountable for their votes on this issue. Who do they represent? Their party and not hospitals and people? Putting their party ahead of the people they represent always is reprehensible.

Copyright the Washington Missourian. Distributed by The Associated Press.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


dan elliott May 2, 2013 | 11:48 a.m.

This fails to acknowledge that someone may have a different view and that the different view may have valid points. Thinking like this is exactly why politicians can not compromise. Check out recent study on Oregon expansion of Medicaid and you will see people are not healthier on Medicaid. You spend more money, but the people are just as sick. And, where do we get the extra money? We already spend more than we have each year. The government is mortgaging our children's future and we are supposed to say but it benefits us now so do it? Many more points could be made, but the main point is each side has to acknowledge the other side is doing what they feel is right and through understanding find middle ground or do nothing. That is how government is supposed to work.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.