Columbia Citizens Police Review Board wants more access to police misconduct files

Wednesday, May 8, 2013 | 11:22 p.m. CDT; updated 11:39 a.m. CDT, Thursday, May 9, 2013

*Correction: This story has been corrected to make Ken Green's comments accurate.

COLUMBIA — The Citizens Police Review Board wants Columbia Police Department records about complaints and concerns to be more accessible for audits.

The board, which does regular audits of complaints and concerns filed about police misconduct, said at its meeting Wednesday night that it doesn't have enough access to these files.

The way the system works now, review board members must go down to the police station to audit the records on their own time.

Board members pleaded their case to Police Chief Ken Burton at Wednesday's meeting, saying the board could review concerns and pass recommendations to the department through mediation.

The reports are complicated and time consuming to sift through, board member Jordon Hargrove said at a special board meeting Saturday. On their last visit on April 18, it took Hargrove and board member Daniel Jacob eight hours to examine six of 104 complaints and concerns.

Burton disagreed with the board's proposal because more access to these concerns meant the private information of the police officers and citizens involved would be out in the open.

"You don't have the line anymore of what's confidential and what's not," Burton said.

Board member Stephen Alexander then suggested that redacting the personal information from these reports would, in principle, protect the identities of those involved in the concerns while giving the board better access.

Burton agreed that redaction could be an option and that he's open to finding a solution.

"I really think there's some middle ground here," Burton said, "So let's try to make it work."

Board members brainstormed some possible solutions that marries access with privacy.

  • Board member Hargrove suggested making the records accessible electronically, guarded by a login given only to the board members.
  • Board member Alexander suggested the Police Department periodically send the board hard copies of the records, which would be shredded after their audits.
  • Again, the board discussed the possibility of redacting officers' and citizens' information in reports given to the board to try to preserve privacy.

The board unanimously voted to create a subcommittee to investigate the best possible solution and to write a letter to City Council proposing an amendment to the city ordinance that gives the board access to the concerns. The group will present its findings at the board's June 12 meeting.

During the public comments portion of the meeting, Ken Green spoke to the board and approved of their efforts.

"Things were said tonight during the interchange between you and those from our police department that make me feel it has never been more urgent for strong, questioning and proactive Citizens Police Review Board," he said.

Supervising editor is Zach Murdock.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Patricia Donalds May 9, 2013 | 1:03 p.m.

National Institute of Justice: ~ Five Things Law Enforcement Executives Can Do To Make A Difference.

DoD study on random polygraphs for personnel.

"the polygraph is the single most effective tool for finding information people were trying to hide." - DoD, NSA

Make policy that polygraphs for all new hires expire every 2-5yrs.

Top Baltimore jail executives to be polygraphed following gang indictment.

California laws strengthened wall of silence around officers.

The California Peace Officers Bill of Rights needs to be reviewed and revised. Especially section 3007.

The honest, brave police officers with integrity deserve more.

Let's get this done.

Never give up folks. Never give in. For the good of the collective whole.


Break the code. Break the culture.

And Walk the Talk.

(Report Comment)
Matthew Schacht May 9, 2013 | 2:51 p.m.

The reporter might want to talk to Robert Powell, a resident who spoke at the May 6th city council meeting about his experience being arrested (he says wrongfully) and not getting help from the police review board.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.