GEORGE KENNEDY: Exercises in democracy, some better than others

Thursday, June 6, 2013 | 7:02 p.m. CDT

On successive evenings this week, a fortunate few of us got a glimpse of how governance is supposed to work and a report of just how dysfunctional politics has become. I was left to reflect on a prescient warning by one of the Founding Fathers.

Monday night's City Council meeting showed, I thought, our elected leaders at their best. First, they ignored the carping from some about "wasteful" spending and agreed unanimously to appropriate something over $300,000 to renovate the interior of the J.W. "Blind" Boone Home and transform it from a relic into a cultural centerpiece. Spending isn't wasteful when it's an investment, as this is.

The bigger and more controversial item on the agenda was the long-simmering issue of what to do with the stretch of Providence Road that fronts the Grasslands Subdivision. In grappling with that issue over the past year, neither the council nor its staff has covered itself in glory.

There has been confusion, misunderstanding and reversal. Monday's discussion and decision, by contrast, struck me as a model of thoughtful argument and a reasonable balancing of interests.

Not everybody would agree, but that's democracy for you.

Money was involved, as always. So was the question of what's most important — pedestrian safety, traffic flow on a major thoroughfare or the convenience of neighborhood residents. The decision ranked the priorities in that order.

Mayor Bob McDavid asserted himself, as he is increasingly wont to do. Laura Nauser responded with a conservative counterpoint.

Karl Skala and Barbara Hoppe, usually allies, argued conflicting positions, with Karl strongly supporting the mayor. Ian Thomas, the rookie, offered a piece of wisdom with broader application:

"We can't build our way out of traffic congestion with more roads."

In the end, the vote was 6-1, with only Fred Schmidt still backing the option preferred by most, but not all, Grasslands residents.

Tuesday night, a different group of citizens packed a conference room in the public library for Chris Kelly's dissection of the recent legislative session. Chris, a Democrat and the senior member of the Boone County delegation, describes himself as an incurable optimist, but even he couldn't find much to praise.

The session was defined by what didn't get accomplished, most notably the expansion of Medicaid under the national Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare. That ideologically driven refusal is likely to cost the Columbia area at least $45 million a year in lost federal funding and the jobs that won't be created.

A painful irony, Chris said, is that the areas that will suffer most are those whose politics are the deepest red — the rural areas whose hospitals will lose subsidies, whose residents are most likely to be uninsured and where new jobs are most needed.

He also bemoaned the failure to take advantage of historically low interest rates by authorizing a billion-dollar bond issue for capital improvements. He is hopeful but skeptical of its chances in the next session.

Those failures and the passage of the income tax cut (since vetoed by Gov. Jay Nixon) are largely attributable, Chris argued, to the impact of term limits and the rise of partisanship. Party caucuses are more important than they used to be, and they are more interested in electoral triumphs than in crafting sound public policy.

That observation reminded me of James Madison, who famously warned in "Federalist No. 10" against the rise of "factions," narrowly focused interest groups that would undermine democracy.

I suspect Mr. Madison would feel vindicated were he to observe the damage that's being wrought by the faction controlling our legislature. Its two huge failures and its major achievement are a perfect illustration of what he feared.

(Of course, Mr. Madison, once he'd finished drafting and defending the Constitution, plunged into partisan politics himself.)

Ideology isn't absent from the City Council, but it hasn't poisoned the process. Close to home, we're closer to the representative democracy Mr. Madison had in mind.

George Kennedy is a former managing editor at the Missourian and professor emeritus at the Missouri School of Journalism.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Michael Williams June 6, 2013 | 10:57 p.m.

"...who famously warned...against the rise of "factions," narrowly focused interest groups that would undermine democracy."

Sometimes I wonder if you write stuff without laughing at your own words.

Take a look in the mirror, dude!

YOU are ALSO a narrowly focused

You've been writing narrowly focused interest pablum for decades!


(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith June 7, 2013 | 7:12 a.m.

Michael Williams:

Some of us are ready, willing, and even able to climb on George's bandwagon - the very day after he publishes in this newspaper concrete proposals to downsize administrative "bloat" in University of Missouri System - particularly at its flagship campus.

If George ever elected to address that subject he might feel forced to leave Columbia, barely ahead of an angry mob.
Who says there are no alternatives without "downsides"? We actually might have our cake and eat it too. James Madison might be astounded.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams June 7, 2013 | 8:01 a.m.

Ellis: Like most liberals, George has great faith in government.

I don't.

While gov't is populated by folks who SAY they wish to do good, I believe they have their own self-serving agendas that mainly involve meddling in everyone else's affairs.

I'm bipartisan with this criticism.

George's faith in gov't is based upon decades of unfulfilled hope; mine is based upon decades of fulfilled disappointment.

George criticizes our state legislature for not "doing" much. I'm quite happy with that outcome. In fact, I support a severe reduction in the number of days that legislatures are in session in an effort to reduce damnphoolishness.

PS: George says finishing the Blind Boone home is a good "investment". George also has a different definition of the word "investment" than me, one that mainly involves someone else's funds. George and I probably also disagree on the definition of the term "asset".

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith June 7, 2013 | 3:13 p.m.


Engineers' (totally functional) definition of the word "asset" = what a chair is meant to be for.

I think it's downright humorous for George to criticize certain things but fail to address overstaffing at University of Missouri System. Even HENRY WATERS(!) has editorialized that UM System and UMC could use some administrative "trimming." Well, you know, we octogenarians tend to be a cantankerous lot. Only the good die young.

George: clean up YOUR "neighborhood," then some of us may actually respect your opinions.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.