Sen. Schaefer defends opposition to Medicaid expansion at GOP meeting

Tuesday, June 18, 2013 | 11:17 p.m. CDT; updated 9:44 a.m. CDT, Wednesday, June 19, 2013

COLUMBIA -- Sen. Kurt Schaefer, R-Columbia, and Rep. Caleb Rowden, R-Columbia, addressed a crowd of about 45 people hosted by the Boone County Pachyderms Club on Tuesday evening.

The bulk of the meeting centered around the legislature’s refusal to expand Medicaid. Four people came to the meeting wearing signs that read, “Full Medicaid expansion now.” For about an hour, they debated Medicaid expansion with Schaefer.

One of the protesters brought up recent layoffs at MU Health Care and Boone Hospital Center, sparking the discussion over Medicaid. Last week, Boone Hospital Center stated it would be cutting 13 part-time and full-time positions, and MU Health Care said it would lay off or cut the hours for 35 employees and not fill 90 vacant positions.

“Boone Hospital’s message is they’re doing the layoffs because of Medicare reductions. Boone Hospital and BJC never said Medicaid,” Schaefer said.

He contrasted this with the reasons MU Health Care gave for eliminating positions.

“The university is going to lay off a handful of people and actually said, and I could not believe it, that they were going to lay people off because we didn’t pass Medicaid expansion,” Schaefer said. “The university hospital made $28 million last year, and they’re going to lay off, what, $200,000 worth of employees to make a statement on that.”

“I think that is absolutely irresponsible,” he continued.

Schaefer expressed his opposition to Medicaid expansion and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as a whole. One reason he cited for not wanting to expand Medicaid is inefficiency in the system.

“You can’t fix the problem by simply pouring more money into it,” he said

He also said expanding Medicaid will affect other parts of the state budget, such as education.

“I am firmly convinced as the chairman of appropriations that there is no possible way to do Medicaid expansion and not have a serious negative impact on public education,” Schaefer said.

Proponents of the expansion have argued for months that it would provide relief to the working poor. They argue there are people who make too much money to qualify for the state’s current Medicaid eligibility, but not enough to pay for insurance on their own or pay out-of-pocket for health care.

For example, a single parent in Missouri with children would not be covered under the state’s current Medicaid system unless he or she made 18 percent of the federal poverty level, according to the Missouri Foundation for Health

“When you look at farmers and small rural communities, a lot of them don’t have access to work-based insurance,” said Brian Smith with the Missouri Rural Crisis Center, who attended the meeting wearing a Medicaid expansion sign. “So, you know, you’re looking at older populations, lower incomes, and they’re paying more for their insurance to begin with.”

Smith said the existence of small, rural hospitals is threatened without expansion.

“What happens is, they have to drastically cut services or in some cases even close,” Smith said. “Then that’s going to put more financial and just patient load pressure on places like Columbia, Springfield, St. Louis.”

“You’re right about some of those hospitals,” Schaefer replied. “I mean, there’s a question about the economic viability of some of those hospitals.”

Schaefer said rural patients often seek care farther away in a place like Columbia because of the high quality of care.

The second-most-discussed topic during the meeting was the collection and sharing of Missouri residents’ information by the Missouri Department of Revenue. Several attendees told Schaefer they were concerned with what the department was doing with the data it collects from them when they renew their driver’s license.

“You have to give up that data to drive on the road now in the state of Missouri,” Schaefer told them.

Schaefer condemned the Revenue Department for collecting Missouri residents’ information and sharing it with a company called MorphoTrust USA. He compared this to the National Security Agency’s PRISM surveillance system, which was revealed by The Guardian earlier this month.

At the beginning of the meeting, Rowden listed some reasons he thought the session was successful, including the passage of the Second Amendment Preservation Act, which attempts to restrict federal acts from infringing on Missourians’ gun rights.

“We’re serious about the Second Amendment,” Rowden said. “We will fight back.”

Rowden also mentioned the passage of an income tax cut as a major victory. Gov. Jay Nixon vetoed the bill.

“We could very well have the votes to override him in September,” Rowden said.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.