Gov. Nixon vetoes bill raising motorist fees

Wednesday, June 26, 2013 | 3:49 p.m. CDT; updated 8:09 p.m. CDT, Wednesday, June 26, 2013

ST. LOUIS — Gov. Jay Nixon on Wednesday vetoed legislation that would have increased the fees for obtaining and renewing driver's licenses and registering vehicles, saying the measure would have doubled the cost without providing an improvement in service.

The legislation would have raised the cost of registering a motor vehicle by $1.50 a year and increased the fee for obtaining a typical driver's license by $5. The fee increases were projected to raise almost $22 million annually.

"Senate Bill 51 goes against our longstanding Missouri values of fiscal discipline, low taxes and a government that lives within its means," Nixon, a Democrat, said while announcing the veto during a news conference in St. Louis.

The bill's sponsor, Sen. Brian Munzlinger, a Republican from the small community of Williamstown in the far northeast of the state, said the bill was needed because fees for licenses have remained unchanged for a decade and some license office contractors — particularly in rural areas — are struggling to turn a profit.

Munzlinger cited Schuyler County, another sparsely populated northeast Missouri County, which closed its office two years ago. Now, Munzlinger said, Schuyler County residents who want to obtain or renew a license must travel to Kirksville.

"For those citizens to drive the 45 miles to Kirksville one way costs them more than what the increase would be at the local license office," Munzlinger said. "The bill was an effort to keep our offices in rural counties open so our constituents would have the service locally."

License offices in Missouri are awarded through a competitive bidding process.

Nixon said the bill also would have unfairly singled out the St. Louis area for a new $2 fee for electronically verifying the status of residents' vehicle emissions inspections. The fee would have applied to residents of St. Louis city and St. Louis, St. Charles, Jefferson and Franklin counties.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Matt Wilkinson June 26, 2013 | 2:06 p.m.

Surely more of these types of services could/will eventually be provided online. But then there is the issue of poor broadband access in rural areas.

(Report Comment)
Jimmy Bearfield June 26, 2013 | 4:40 p.m.

Most of rural MO has at least two broadband providers:

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.