DAVID ROSMAN: Approach gang problem with smart strategy, not hammers

Thursday, June 27, 2013 | 6:00 a.m. CDT

Four shootings and one dead in less than 10 days and Fifth Ward City Council member Laura Nauser has an epiphany: Columbia has a gang problem, and the fix she and others propose is a law-and-order approach.

Oh, if it were only that simple.

For years, I have written in this column that Columbia has a gang problem. I have talked about possible solutions and have warned against the acceleration of violence. I am afraid the shootings so far in 2013 are a precursor to what we will see this summer.

In his report, “Into the Abyss: A personal journey into the world of street gangs,” Missouri State University’s Mike Carlie cites Robert M. Gordon’s research: "The main reasons for involvement with ... gangs and [wanna-be] groups were: economic and ethnic marginality; material gain; the attraction of supportive peer groups; and flight from abusive family circumstances."

Carlie continues, "Gangs form to satisfy needs which are going unmet in the families, schools and neighborhoods in which they live or which are perceived as unavailable to the youths who join them."

This is an economic and education problem that will not be addressed by simply enforcing curfews and putting more cops on the street.

The root of gang involvement

The problem stems from a level of “fatalism” caused by poverty, lack of education and no viable employment opportunities. It comes from an “ignorance of inner-city America… [by] most of us who don’t have to survive there.”

The causes in Columbia are more than “we are a way station between St. Louis and Kansas City.”

Take a look at the numbers:

Though Columbia’s unemployment is well under the national and state rates — 4.2 percent versus 6.6 percent statewide as of April 2013 — the city's average income is 16 percent lower than the national average.

The 2013 poverty rate for a family of four is $23,550, or about $11.77 an hour if one is working full-time. The Bureau of Labor Statistics tells us that about 28 percent of "careers" in Columbia do not meet this minimum standard.

If that number does not rattle a few chains, the American Community Survey reports that in 2012, 19.2 percent of Boone County citizens live at or below the poverty rate.

Missouri’s poverty rate in 2011 was 15.8 percent.

Job loss contributes to the problem

This month alone, IBM and ABC Labs, Boone Hospital and MU Health Care are laying off workers or not planning to fill vacant positions. 

The Center for American Progress reports that in Missouri, “children attending school in higher-poverty districts still have substantially less access to state and local revenue than children attending school in lower-poverty districts.”

This is the City Council focusing on high-paid professional careers and businesses without consideration for the people who maintain the facilities, feed the masses, educate future generations and sell the fancy clothing, the latest electronics and fancy sneakers but live at or below poverty wages. Almost all are without access to health or dental care insurance.

Ms. Nauser and others continue to look at the “problem” from a fear perspective, seeking a simple heavy-handed solution of enforcement to an extremely complex problem. They are missing the human factors of employment, education and a viable future.

Cures not easy, but rewarding

The argument here is simple, that this is not just a “gang problem” but a “people problem” that can be substantially reduced. We know why street gangs exist — poverty and lack of support systems, few living wage jobs, poorly funded education systems and the outlook of a dismal future.

It is the cures that are difficult, requiring a complete revamping of our vision of society. It is not a move toward socialism, but a return to humanism; not a redistribution of wealth, but creating an avenue to a living wage.

We do not need a bigger hammer to stop gang violence. Hammers we have. Let’s use them to fix the underlying problems, jobs, education and family.

Not more cops, but more cops meeting the community. Not more laws, but more jobs paying living wages.

Not punishing schools for low scores on standardized tests, but giving the test takers a positive vision of tomorrow.

David Rosman is an editor, writer, professional speaker and college instructor in communications, ethics, business and politics. 

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Michael Williams June 27, 2013 | 7:55 a.m.


For over 6 decades, I've watched this exact, same liberal pablum fail. Trillions of Billions of Thousands of The ideas expressed in your Your

Your way is utterly bankrupt.


(Report Comment)
Skip Yates June 27, 2013 | 4:10 p.m.

Two gang-bangers beat a man senseless and leave him broken and bleeding on the sidewalk. Liberal says "Quick, we have to catch those guys and get them help"........

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith June 27, 2013 | 4:31 p.m.


Your response, above, appears comprehensive and allows little room to misinterpret your views.

Bear in mind that in some people political theories tend to assume the status of a religion: an ersatz religion to be certain, but a form of religion nevertheless.

We might have more success at solving problems if indivduals began taking resposibility for their actions rather than blaming everyone else for them, and when foolish but [possibly] well meaning dupes cease excusing a lack of individual responsibility.

As for the "Church of Lack of Individual Accountability*," as I have noted before I was once one of its members. No more!

*- aka "The Church of If Anything is Wrong, Society Is at Fault." Well, there you have it! All we need to do is abolish society. Michael, I've just solved our problems without spending a nickel, and in one afternoon.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams June 27, 2013 | 6:51 p.m.

Ellis: "All we need to do is abolish society."

This reminds me of something long ago; I'm unsure if I have mentioned this before in this place.

Back in high school, a friend of mine and me were talking about societal problems (yes, indeedy....high school, no less!). He made a comment that stuck with me to this day, paraphrased as follows:

"The mark of success in this world is the ability to separate yourself from the [substitute synonym for rectal orifice, plural tense] among us."

I've managed to do that, so I guess I abolished my native society and substituted one of my own choosing....that happens to be MUCH more pleasant.

PS: THE definition of freedom is having options from which you can choose.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith June 27, 2013 | 8:12 p.m.


I assume your high school friend referred to ALL "rectal "oriface" personages, regardless of race, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, religion (or lack of one), social and economic status, etc., because in my experience such types are found in every possible category (no expections).

The preferred mode of addressing problems today seems to be to first group all humans into categories and then deal - or not - with those categories, never with individuals. This lowers humans to at best the status of farm animals.

Speaking of farms, "Koo koo Kulak, the pause that rededicates." [Pogo] Kulaks weren't a category one would have wished to be in. Perhaps if Kulaks had formed gangs...

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams June 27, 2013 | 10:47 p.m.

Yes, Ellis.....they come in all shapes and sizes.

PS: Moo.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith June 28, 2013 | 5:21 a.m.


I am not making this up, but several years ago I had some spell check software which, whenever I used the initials "MU" corrected it to "MOO." Well, UM System's agricultural efforts don't seem to extend much to UMKC, UMSL and MS&T. Suits us. (No jokes about coeds or sheep, please.)

Several decades ago a lady wrote a very humorous little book about life at Iowa State University titled simply "MOO."

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.