WHAT OTHERS SAY: Snowden matter shows that NSA contracts need a tougher review

Thursday, July 4, 2013 | 6:00 a.m. CDT

Edward Snowden is a hero to some and a villain to others.

Whatever one thinks of the 30-year-old computer expert’s decision to reveal the existence of a clandestine federal program to monitor domestic communication, the ease with which he obtained and shared classified information is disconcerting and requires an examination.

About 4.5 million Americans have security clearance to access classified data, and a quarter of them work for private contractors, as Snowden did. The Office of Personnel Management is supposed to check their backgrounds, but it lacks the resources to do them all itself. So the government hires private security firms to do most of them. The firm USIS conducted Snowden’s check.

At a recent U.S. Senate hearing co-chaired by Claire McCaskill, it was revealed that USIS is under a federal criminal investigation for what may be a “systemic failure” to properly conduct investigations. That raises serious questions about the efficacy and security of outsourcing secrecy.

Missouri’s Democratic senator, who is chairwoman of the Senate Subcommittee on Financial and Contracting Oversight, is well positioned to represent the public interest. She can demand answers and push for change.

Oversight of top-secret work is inherently difficult because only a limited number of people have clearance to scrutinize it. The job is doubly hard when the work is conducted by private contractors whose internal security and personnel policies fall outside direct federal scrutiny.

That is why McCaskill’s work is so important. Over the years she has taken the initiative to keep a careful eye on government contractors, seek smart reform and ensure taxpayer money is spent wisely. Regardless of one’s political leanings, it is a good thing for a senator to specialize in this area right now.

Beyond tougher oversight of security contractors, the government should also reassess how much work it delegates to them.

Reasonable people can disagree about how many secrets the government should keep, but some are necessary. Officials must take steps that ensure the most essential secrets remain that way. Farming out the work only courts trouble.

Copyright The Kansas City Star. Reprinted with permission.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.