advertisement

MU, Missouri S&T announce small modular nuclear reactor consortium

Tuesday, July 30, 2013 | 7:45 p.m. CDT

COLUMBIA — This week, the University of Missouri System declared its intention to work with the energy industry to promote small-scale nuclear power plants.

On Monday, the UM System announced a partnership among Ameren Missouri, Westinghouse Electric Co. and two UM campuses to conduct research related to small modular nuclear reactors, or SMRs.

In the announcement, system President Tim Wolfe said the partnership would support a small modular reactor "renaissance for the nuclear industry."

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, small modular reactors are miniature nuclear power plants with the capacity to generate 300 megawatts or less of electricity. They can be mass-produced in a factory and shipped by truck or rail.

Joseph Smith, director of the Energy Research and Development Center at the Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, said these reactors can be strategically placed to augment conventional and renewable energy sources to help meet demand.

"You could think about that just like you think about a hybrid automobile," Smith wrote in an email. "SMRs could become part of a hybrid energy system that combines legacy fossil energy (i.e., coal gasification) with renewable energy (i.e., wind or solar)."

Smith said the consortium had its kickoff meeting Wednesday in Pittsburgh. Representatives from Ameren, Westinghouse, MU and Missouri S&T were among those present, he said.

Ameren and Westinghouse each put forth a $60,000 annual membership fee. Smith said Westinghouse is an ideal consortium partner because of its AP1000 reactor technology that has already received Nuclear Regulatory Commission approval.

"That’s the gold standard," Smith said of the AP1000 reactor.

Westinghouse and Ameren are already partners in the nuclear industry. The nuclear reactor at the Callaway Nuclear Power Plant is a Westinghouse reactor.

In April, Westinghouse and Ameren declared they would continue to pursue $226 million in Department of Energy funding for small modular reactors. The companies had applied for an earlier round of funding worth more than $450 million but lost in November to a team comprising Babcock & Wilcox Co., the Tennessee Valley Authority and Bechtel Corp.

Missouri Technology Corp., a nonprofit entity established by the Missouri General Assembly to promote science and technology development, also will put forth $250,000 in funding over three years.

The Missouri Technology Corp.’s board of directors approved the grant at its June 28 board meeting, said Amy Susan, director of marketing and communications for the Missouri Department of Economic Development.

One of the consortium’s goals is to increase membership to five in three years and 10 in five years, Smith said. He said the consortium has the potential to attract members from a variety of industrial sectors, including manufacturing, reactor vendors and transportation. Other universities can also join the consortium.

"The opportunity to leverage its investment is a key benefit for consortium members," Smith said. "A bigger and more significant issue is consortium members can join the team of industries involved in the SMR supply chain."

Smith developed a PowerPoint presentation about the consortium based on a funding proposal to the Missouri Technology Corp. In it, he listed seven areas of focus for consortium research:

  • Design and modeling
  • Infrastructure
  • Manufacturing
  • Materials
  • Nuclear fuel
  • Systems
  • Education and outreach

Smith emphasized the economic benefits for Missouri if this consortium helps lead to more widespread adoption of small nuclear reactors. He said it could lead to jobs in manufacturing, operation and transportation, to name a few.

The nuclear industry already holds plenty of job opportunities for students who receive proper training, he said.

Missouri S&T and MU each operate research reactors and offer nuclear science and engineering programs. Several undergraduate senior capstone teams at Missouri S&T have produced projects relating to small modular reactors, Smith said.

"I think it’s a great opportunity for the companies but more importantly for the students," Smith said. "Workforce training is a big deal for this consortium."

Supervising editor is Elizabeth Brixey.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

linda green July 31, 2013 | 1:35 p.m.

"Kill nuclear power before it kills us", says S. David Freeman. See You Tube video with this title at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1R4jc2wlGs

Freeman is former Chairman of the Board of TVA. He says don't be fooled by advertisements of the industry, which owns big chunks of the media, and, "You could stop nuclear power with just one law--eliminate the federal insurance for nuclear power....a technology that the marketplace will not insure." He says there was never a nuclear plant built that is economically viable over time. What is the economics of dealing with the eventual shutdown of radioactive nuclear plants, which have limited life and become more dangerous as they age, and with 30 years (so far) buildup of nuclear waste, highly poisonous for millions of years, with no safe place on earth to put it? The financial cost is incalculable, even if there were no more nuclear accidents.

And nuclear accidents have already wiped out huge chunks of Japan and huge chunks of the Ukraine. The Callaway plant could release many times the nuclear contamination of Hiroshima, and, through explosion, fire, internal sabotage or terrorist attack, could destroy for centuries many thousands of acres of Missouri. And the Callaway plant is storing its poisonous spent fuel in a pool instead of putting it into hard cask dry storage, where the waste would be safer, at least temporarily.

Freeman says we need to invest our money and our energies in what is safest and most economically viable--solar and wind energy with storage, which would produce a great many jobs and economic benefit. We don't need to waste any more of our time, money and our energy and put ourselves at even greater risk by making more nuclear plants of any size.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements