DEAR READER: Newspapers take more hits

Friday, August 2, 2013 | 5:34 p.m. CDT; updated 12:45 p.m. CDT, Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Dear Reader,

Some weeks are harder than others to remain optimistic about the prospects for newspapers.


Related Media

On Wednesday, the Cleveland Plain Dealer cut a third of its newsroom staff. It wasn’t a surprise. The Plain Dealer is owned by Advance Publications, which has been shredding newsrooms across the country. (See New Orleans Times-Picayune. See Birmingham News. Etc.)

On Thursday, Gannett newspapers laid off at least 223 newsroom employees across 37 worksites, according to a list compiled by Gannett Blog, an independent site that follows the company.

Gannett owns newspapers in 33 states as well as USA Today. So 223 might not seem like much, compared to almost 50 at the Plain Dealer. But I’m sure one position is a lot in Manitowoc, Wis., or Marion, Ohio. At least one alum of the Columbia Missourian was laid off in Springfield, Mo., another in Burlington, Vt.

She had been hired last month.

The question this all brings us to: How does the decline of these newsrooms affect the health of the cities they serve?

The loss of watchdog reporting is most often cited. Philadelphia Daily News senior writer Will Bunch notes that Plain Dealer reporters kept alive the stories of Amanda Berry and Gina DeJesus long after they had been presumed dead. “In the clips,” he wrote, “you sensed that the journalists were more aggressive at times than the authorities.” Berry, DeJesus and Michelle Knight were held prisoner in a Cleveland home for more than a decade until Berry escaped in May.

Gone as well are too many beats that reflect the character of a community.  

On the Gannett Blog site, Dan Piller wrote that the Des Moines Register no longer has a full-time agriculture reporter. Sure, Des Moines is an urban city, but the state that surrounds it isn’t: Iowa ranks first in production of corn, hogs, soybeans and eggs, according to the USDA.

Piller told me he was the last full ag writer, and even then, he combined it with reporting on energy. (Iowa is also at the tops in things like wind energy and ethanol, Piller said.) I don’t know whether the job is gone forever, but there’s nothing listed on the Gannett jobs site.

In two weeks, a new crop of students will arrive at the Missourian's doorsteps, most eager to become photographers, reporters, designers and copy editors.

What do I tell them?

These Missouri School of Journalism students know that they enter journalism in uncertain times. Many of them, in fact, are tired of hearing about it.

I will tell them that there’s a need, stronger than ever, for journalism. I’ll tell them that the practice is still about serving the people of mid-Missouri.

And I’ll tell them to learn everything they can, because we just don’t know what kinds of jobs will be waiting for them when they walk out of these doors.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Ellis Smith August 2, 2013 | 10:00 p.m.

As I have previously pointed out, there are ways to use a journalism degree other than hoping to find a job in newpaper journalism. You could point that out to incoming students.

Newspaper journalism is in an apparently irreverible state of decline, and perspective journalism students need to understand that.

PS: Meanwhile, there are nagging shortages of graduates in several engineering disciplines, and that situation isn't expected to correct itself any time soon.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams August 2, 2013 | 10:40 p.m.

"The question this all brings us to: How does the decline of these newsrooms affect the health of the cities they serve?"

A much better question is why the hell do many, many newspapers (and other media) deliberately alienate ca. one-half of their potential revenue stream?

Yes, there is a need for stronger journalism, but we won't get it until journalists learn to leave their politics at the door. That includes ALL journalists....

Those who editorialize can do what they like.

Not journalists.

The two should NEVER be mixed.

PS: Yes, newspapers are having a bad time. The real reasons for this are different than the ones believed by the newspapers. It's an ostrich-head-in-sand thingie and, given the purpose of the industry, is quite surprising. One of the first things I ever learned about business was "Listen to your potential customers!!!"

Plus, we consumers have options unavailable to us 20 years ago. And, we're using them. The hard part is telling which information source is good and which isn't, but since many of us have seen our trust in traditional journalism erode, we're really not that much worse off in our decision-making tree.

It's a sad state of affairs when news sources close to us are viewed with the same skepticism as unknown and distant news sources. But, that's what you're faced with. There it is.......

(Report Comment)
Ed Ricciotti August 3, 2013 | 7:56 p.m.

Journalism to me is about getting the story. If a politician says something and the journalist's research sees a discrepancy, then it is their duty to confront and demand an explanation from that official. However many in power due to politics and/or wealth have changed the narrative to accuse those making them uncomfortable part of the "liberal media".

Journalism is not just getting two sides of the story and leaving it like that. If that were true, we would have uninspiring headlines like "The world is round, critics differ".

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.