WHAT OTHERS SAY: New FDA rules for imported food protect the public

Thursday, August 8, 2013 | 6:00 a.m. CDT

As we have become a nation of aspirational gourmets, we like to import our coffee beans, cheeses and wines.

We want them to be exotic, connoting adventure and an appreciation for the extraordinary. Thanks to globalization, an increasing number of less-fancy foods are imported, too. But there is a problem with this bounty.

We want to eat well and not die of food poisoning.

Two-thirds of fruits and vegetables and 80 percent of seafood are imported into the United States. But a mere 2 percent of food imports is inspected at ports as they enter the country.

That’s where the federal government can help. On July 26, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration proposed new rules that are intended to increase the safety of imported foods.

In announcing the rules, FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg said: “Many of the most vulnerable commodities are coming from countries with less-mature systems in terms of regulatory oversight and farming practices. This is an opportunity to help build regulatory capacity and improve safety standards.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports recent examples of food-borne illnesses from imported foods include pomegranate seeds from Turkey that were used in a berry mix and caused a hepatitis A outbreak that sickened more than 150 people and cucumbers from Mexico that sickened 84 people in 18 states from a salmonella outbreak.

The rules will require importers to guarantee that their products meet the same standards as domestically produced goods. It allows the FDA to accredit third-party auditors in other countries to certify the safety of high-risk imported foods or the foreign facilities from which they come.

Thus companies are motivated to reassure worried consumers that they have prevented contaminated foods from entering the country, instead of responding to problems after an outbreaks.

The Pew Charitable Trusts, which support the draft rules, urged swift implementation with limited exemptions and sufficient funding.

“In an increasingly globalized food supply, the new standards will help to level the playing field for American businesses, farmers and food processors,” Pew said in a statement. “The announcement is also good news for consumers who have suffered from poor safety standards and the delayed release of stronger rules.”

Imports have been responsible for eight of 19 reported multi-state food-related illness outbreaks since 2011, when the FDA’s landmark Food Safety Modernization Act was passed, according to the CDC. Food-borne illnesses are estimated to kill 3,000 people in the United States every year.

Consumer and industry groups praised the rules. These, and another set regarding domestic food producers, are open for comment for 120 days. Then they will be implemented.

This is not a nanny-state effort or government intrusion or regulation run amok. It’s a serious and necessary step to protect public health. These rules make sense and should be approved, pronto.

Copyright St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Reprinted with permission.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Mark Foecking August 8, 2013 | 8:15 a.m.

I'm not against this, but the question we need to ask is - how safe is safe enough? We have to recognize that nothing is totally safe, and that the safer we make something, the more the law of diminishing returns affects the next step.

We accept 35,000 deaths per year from automobiles, and driving is a choice, not a basic need. Plus, how many of the 3,000 deaths are caused by poor food handling by the consumer? Increasing oversight of producers won't affect how the food is handled by consumers.

Like I say, I'm not against this. But we do need to look at our priorities and see where we can save the most lives for the least cost.


(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.