Coach Gary Pinkel: Pay Missouri Tigers football, basketball players

Monday, September 9, 2013 | 5:58 p.m. CDT; updated 9:50 p.m. CDT, Monday, September 9, 2013

COLUMBIA — One of the most prominent faces in Missouri athletics has decided enough is enough. On Monday, Gary Pinkel said Tigers football and men’s basketball players should be paid for their services.

“I’ve kind of changed my view on this over the last few years,” said Pinkel in a video post on his website. “Just because of the amount of money now that is in college football and the billions and billions of dollars that are out there.”

The head football coach also implied that the SEC is currently pursuing a player payment system, which would not align with the NCAA’s rules that prevent players from receiving any financial benefits past scholarships and minimal resources. And there are other potential barriers — Title IX and some schools' lack of significant athletics revenue, for instance — that could prevent an equal playing field when it comes to paying athletes.

Plus, there is the argument that players are already being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in scholarship money.

“That’s fine,” Pinkel said. “They’re gonna get their education, which is important. But I also think we can give them additional money per semester or per quarter to help them and really pay them back for all their sacrifices.

“I think it’s the right thing to do. And I think it’s the fair thing to do.”

But how much money do the cash cow sports generate for the athletics department, and how much of that would be left over to pay players?

In July 2012, the Kansas City Star reported that the Missouri football team produced more than $24 million annually in revenue from 2009 to 2011. After expenses, that was enough to add $10 million annually to the bottom line.

The switch from the Big 12 to the SEC in 2012 also brought in roughly $8 million in extra revenue. Some of this should be reserved for the players, Pinkel said.

“I don’t think it’s extra money,” Pinkel said. “Let’s say this: You’re giving them money that they should have. They should’ve had it from a few years back.”

Pinkel said Missouri and the SEC are moving toward a proposal or resolution to pay players.

This movement has gained traction in the past couple months.

Last week’s cover of Time Magazine proclaimed, “It’s Time to Pay College Athletes,” and the NCAA responded to claims that it is taking advantage of young athletes by announcing that it would stop selling specifically numbered football jerseys (i.e. a No. 20 MU jersey resembling the one Henry Josey wears) on its official website.

Several prominent college coaches such as Steve Spurrier of South Carolina and Mack Brown of Texas have also recently called for a player-payment system. Now, the movement has official support on a local level in Columbia.

“I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it,” Pinkel said. “As long as it’s done with clarity and it’s done with an understanding that we’re trying to help the kids but also don’t want to make it ridiculous.”

Supervising editor is Zachary Matson.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Ellis Smith September 9, 2013 | 8:09 p.m.

No one should criticize Pinkel's view, because this appears to be the next logical step in the current history of our nation's biggest bad joke.

How much should we pay the players? Should they make as much as an average tenured faculty member? Surely they shouldn't be THAT poorly compensated!

Maybe outstanding performers should be paid more; perhaps as much as an academic dean (we understand that academic deans do exist in UM System, but only at the MU, UMKC and UMSL campuses)?

Will there be bonuses based on special effort, such as yardage gained, three-point shots made, pass interceptions, average punt distance, etc.

Will this apply to ALL THREE NCAA Divisions: I, II and III?
Now, only schools in Divisions I and II may award athletic scholarships, yet there are a substantial number of schools (including University of Chicago and M.I.T.) who field teams in Division III (also, for that matter, in Division II).

So in Division III we could have an interesting situation where the school could not, by current rule, award an athletic scholarship but could attract student athletes by simply paying them. A few Division III private schools are pretty well heeled - if that's how they want to spend their money.

Pinkel and others need to consider whether, if they start paying male Division I basketball players, that WOMEN basketball players won't demand equal treatment. I would.

We're sure Pinkel is familiar with the old saying that "Hell has no fury like a woman scorned." :)

(Report Comment)
Mike Martin September 9, 2013 | 9:31 p.m.

Agree wholeheartedly with Pinkel. Probably the first sane discussion college sports has had in the last 20 years.

(Report Comment)
Nathan Whitaker September 10, 2013 | 6:06 a.m.

So, now can we stop pretending that football and basketball players are there to get an "education"? It was an amusing fiction, but you didn't fool anyone.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith September 10, 2013 | 8:54 a.m.

BTW when are Pinkel, Alden and the outgoing MU chancellor going to explain to both the Tiger faithful and the rest of us* in this so-called "system" the circumstances of MU's failure to be accepted into the Big 10 Athletic Conference?

At least one daily newspaper located in the Big 10's present geographic area some time ago proffered a reason. Whether they were correct or not, their version is plausible, and to our knowledge hasn't been refuted by the Big 10 or any of its member schools.

*-We have a right to know, whether we care or not.

(Report Comment)
Skip Yates September 10, 2013 | 10:28 a.m.

Well, you just can't ignore Title IX. So, should the quarterback be paid more than the 3rd string center? Wouldn't the pitcher on the girls softball team rate as much as the pitcher on the men's baseballl team? When it comes to work, shouldn't the girl freshman gymnast who won a medal in the Olympics make more than the top SEC quarterback?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.