advertisement

Columbia city staff opposes rezoning for CVS

Wednesday, September 18, 2013 | 6:14 p.m. CDT; updated 8:35 p.m. CDT, Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Will Columbia get a new CVS at the corner of Broadway and Providence? Numerous city officials have denounced the project, saying it would disturb downtown Columbia’s aesthetic and threaten nearby historic sites.

COLUMBIA— The summer of negotiations between CVS Pharmacy and city planners about rezoning land near Flat Branch Park culminated when city staff issued a report calling the CVS's proposal "unsupportable."

The Columbia Planning and Zoning Commission is scheduled to vote on the rezoning request when it meets at 7 p.m. Thursday in the Daniel Boone City Building. The City Council will make the final decision. 

Staff's main objections, as enumerated in the 82-page report, are the building's drive-thru, its aesthetics and the impact it would have on Flat Branch Park.

"It just doesn't fit," said city planner Steve MacIntyre, who prepared the report. "That's the bottom line. We can't recommend something that doesn't fit."

If the city rezones the land, CVS would demolish three buildings and cover part of Flat Branch with a parking lot.

MacIntyre acknowledges rezoning the land from its current mix of commercial and industrial designations would bring it more closely in line with surrounding properties, but approving the store would muddle nearly every plan the city has for the "gateway" — the entrance to downtown at Providence Road and Broadway.

CVS has postponed the Planning Commission vote twice in order to revise its building designs. The latest version — MacIntyre said it's the fourth — includes a brick façade, a display window along Broadway and a pocket park.

"Despite these architectural embellishments," the report reads, "city staff believe that the lack of a pedestrian-oriented entrance onto either Broadway or Fourth Street, combined with the location of the drive-thru lane along Fourth Street frontage, and the one-story auto-oriented nature of the request as a whole to be undesirable at this major gateway to downtown." 

City staff members have joined a chorus of city groups who have been lobbying the Planning Commission and City Council to block the development. The Downtown Columbia Leadership Council and the Historic Preservation Commission have each written strongly-worded letters denouncing the CVS proposal.

MacIntyre said rezoning proposals are not simply "a black and white situation where there's a right answer and a wrong answer."

"But in a case like this, there's enough indication of what would be preferred on this corner — based on existing community plans — that it's really our duty to forward that information along and point out that it doesn't comply with what may be envisioned there," he said.

Robert Hollis, an attorney for the property owner, Mark Stevenson, submitted the application to rezone on July 1.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

hank ottinger September 18, 2013 | 10:16 p.m.

MacIntyre is right: "It doesn't fit." I like his sense of "duty" as well. If the city is ever to create a pleasing gateway, once a generic, one-size-fits-all, anytown-USA drug store plops down, we're stuck-yuck with it. Hope P &Z does the right thing here, and the council follows suit.

(Report Comment)
Corey Parks September 18, 2013 | 11:13 p.m.

CVS just needs to design the building like another cheap college loft system and they will be approved quickly. Columbia Planners never seen a college project they didn't like no matter how poorly designed.

(Report Comment)
John Schultz September 19, 2013 | 12:17 a.m.

Seems to me that the city shouldn't have a say in a "gateway" (ack) if they don't own the land. Are they going to use eminent domain to take out the payday loan place cattycorner from the proposed CVS location as well and cleanup that corner of the gateway?

(Report Comment)
Jerri Eldridge September 19, 2013 | 8:24 a.m.

Who's paying the City for their support. It looks like citizens of Columbia and taxpayers have no say in what is acceptable or not or what businesses are acceptable. It all comes down to who pays the most money to get their way. We didn't have imput for Walgreens at any of the locations. At the present time I think the business's located here are in deplorable condition. They have made no effort to make the area look more apeasing or had complaints not until someone else is interested in the property.

(Report Comment)
LN Mazuch September 19, 2013 | 10:08 a.m.

You know what would be a great District "gateway" at this corner? An expanded Flat Branch Park. If we're going to call it a gateway, maybe let's attempt some aesthetic beauty at the intersection that is (arguably) the ugliest in the city right now?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements