advertisement

WHAT OTHERS SAY: Missouri should stop state-sanctioned killing

Sunday, November 24, 2013 | 6:00 a.m. CST

Of the many reasons to oppose the death penalty, the simplest and most compelling is that it is morally wrong for the state to take a human life.

That was the case just after 6 a.m. Wednesday, when Missouri executed Joseph Paul Franklin, a paranoid schizophrenic who hated blacks and Jews. He was convicted of killing eight people around the country between 1977 and 1980, including Gerald Gordon in a sniper shooting outside a St. Louis synagogue.

And it will be the case if Missouri carries out its scheduled Dec. 11 execution of Allen Nicklasson, known as the “Good Samaritan killer” because he murdered a man who stopped to help him after his car broke down.

Both men committed horrible acts and deserved to live out their lives in prison. But executions do nothing to cure mental illness, prevent brokenness in human beings or make the public any safer. They are acts of state-sanctioned vengeance, and they are wrong.

That belief — held by growing numbers of people — is what forced Missouri to conceal important information about the identity of the compounding pharmacy that prepared the dose of pentobarbital used to kill Franklin. The company was listed as a member of the execution team, which by state law is granted anonymity.

For good reason, pharmaceutical companies are increasingly unwilling to be partners in executions. The European Union is boycotting the use of drugs manufactured there for the purpose of killing inmates.

Pentobarbital’s manufacturer, Akorn Inc. of Illinois, won’t authorize its product to be used for executions. But the drug can be mixed in small doses by a pharmacy that prepares specialty medicines. These places, compounding pharmacies, are unregulated and controversial. Some have been responsible for outbreaks of illness. In Kansas City, former pharmacist Robert Courtney is in prison for diluting chemotherapy medications.

A bill calling for more regulation of compounding pharmacies has recently cleared Congress. But it does nothing to stop the businesses from preparing execution drugs.

Missouri is on shaky ground here, enlisting an unnamed pharmacy to mix a drug normally used to euthanize animals and injecting that drug into the veins of a condemned man. The secrecy and the act itself are wrong.

Studies have consistently shown the death penalty is costly, used disproportionately against minorities and risky as an irreversible outcome of a flawed criminal justice system. Missouri legislators should end it in favor of strict life sentences for those who commit the most heinous crimes.

Copyright The Kansas City Star. Reprinted with permission. 


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Dudley Sharp November 24, 2013 | 6:03 p.m.

Editorials seldom get worse than this.

The Star has no clue.

All sanctions, as the death penalty, are supported because they are considered a just and proportional sanction.

The Star doesn't know this?

Criminal justice systems were created to take vengeance out of the process, bringing law and due process and assuring that those directly harmed by the crime, and those close to them, are, specifically, not fact finders in the case, completely removong revenge from the process.

The Star doesn't know this?

Compounding pharmacies provide medication for millions of patients, as well as work with doctors and hospitals, with great success.

There is no doubt that the death penalty can be cheaper than LWOP and it, already, is, in responsible jurisdictions (1).

White murderers are twice as likely to be executed as black murderers (2).

Yes, the Star has no clue.

1) Saving Costs with The Death Penalty
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/02/de...

2) RACE & THE DEATH PENALTY: A REBUTTAL TO THE RACISM CLAIMS
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2012/07/re...

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith November 25, 2013 | 6:24 a.m.

@ Dudley Sharp:

I agree with your intial observation, Dudley, but I think there's worse yet to come. It would be interesting to learn where the person who wrote this editorial received their journalistic education. (There actually IS more than one journalism school in the United States.)

I'll bet the same person who wote this editorial thinks "terminating" the existence of the unborn is just wonderful. Nothing like being consistent!

After 1933 and before the war broke out in 1939 the National SOCIALISTS had a program to "euthanize" living children who exhibited physical and/or mental defects. Well of course! How could they claim to be a "Master Race" if there were physically and mentally defective children running around?

Maybe that will be next on our domestic Socialist "to do" list, but in no case will convicted murders, who have the Constitutional right to multiple legal appeals of their death sentences, ever be exexuted. Consistency, isn't it wonderful?

Disgusting!

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements