City gateway design concepts open to public opinion

Thursday, January 16, 2014 | 7:16 p.m. CST; updated 11:49 p.m. CST, Thursday, January 16, 2014
Jay Gebhardt, a civil engineer with A Civil Group, one of the three firms consulting for the Gateway project, describes existing structures on street corners where there is potential for public art to members of the PedNet Coalition.

COLUMBIA — Chicago has "The Bean." St. Louis has "The Arch." Downtown Columbia may be on its way to having its own city gateway, thanks to Thursday's public input meeting.

The public was invited to the downtown offices of the Regional Economic Development Inc. to weigh in on three concept designs Thursday night. Between 20 and 40 people were in the room for the meeting, and conversation was always engaging and lively.

The city of Columbia and The District have teamed up with St. Louis architectural design firm Arcturis, Columbia civil engineering firm A Civil Group and St. Louis public art consulting firm Via Partnership to draft potential "gateway" markers for downtown Columbia.

The three concept themes presented by the collaborating firms were education, energy and "the hub."

  • Education: pay homage to the town's three universities, as well as well-known Missourians involved in literature and the arts
  • Energy: emulate the youthful, contemporary vibe of the city — a place people have marked down as somewhere they want to visit again
  • The hub: a cultural center of not only the city of Columbia but also of Missouri in its entirety

The designs each incorporated illumination for nighttime viewing, pedestrian safety and a variety of structures and materials.

Photos of some of the designs can be seen on the Downtown Columbia Gateway Project Facebook page.

Green dot of approval

Each visitor was given a sticky green dot to "vote" for his or her favorite design. Comment sheets were also provided for input on the Gateway project and the city's identity.

Kristi Ray, Columbia Chamber of Commerce executive vice president, voted for the education concept.

"I love the colors that depict the three colleges," Ray said. "And it carries the theme of columns throughout the town."

Crystal Midkiff, executive director of Mustard Seed Fair Trade, was decidedly in favor of the hub.

"The other concepts, education and energy, can be incorporated into the hub concept," Midkiff said.

Midkiff said she liked the hub because it was a less concrete concept and allows for more artistic freedom.

"It can involve the entire District instead of just the gateways," Midkiff said.

Addison's owner and member of the Gateway Committee, Adam Dushoff, also voted for the hub.

"On my comment sheet, though, I described combining education and the hub," Dushoff said. "This is its first step outside of the committee, so nothing here will be exactly what's built."

A public survey will be shared Friday or Monday on the Facebook page so residents who were unable to come to the meeting can voice their opinions and suggestions.

The next step

Carrie Gartner, executive director of The District, was extremely pleased with the number of residents who showed up to the meeting.

"They've been asking questions, giving advice," she said. "We're really happy that our goals for this project match up with what people want to see."

Russ Volmert, director of planning for Arcturis, said the firms will use the feedback from the comment sheets, voting, the online survey and more meetings to formulate a final concept.

"That will be what is refined and presented," Volmert said. "This meeting is really to define the message."

A second public meeting will take place at the end of February. Residents can check for updates on the Downtown Columbia Gateway Project Facebook page.

Supervising editor is Elise Schmelzer.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


John Schultz January 17, 2014 | 10:02 a.m.

It's a shame the Missourian didn't include pictures of the designs like the Tribune did, because I would love to see Mike's and Ellis' reactions.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith January 17, 2014 | 10:51 a.m.

John Schultz:

I've seen the designs (posted elsewhere). I find them very interesting.

Since my degrees are in engineering and not fine (visual) arts, and since my degrees were awarded by an institution not exactly a household name for its fine arts programs, I don't feel qualified to comment upon - let alone critique - the designs under consideration.

Since I no longer reside in Columbia I don't give a "rat's posterior" what design is ultimately selected. I realize that comment is uncouth, but I'm the graduate of an uncouth campus.

Hopefully that will satisfy your curiosity. :)

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams January 17, 2014 | 11:40 a.m.

JohnS: My reaction was "Ugh!"

But then I've not liked Columbia's art since the flying french fries were birthed long ago. However, I will say that I was ENTIRELY wrong about the various musical animals nearby the courthouse.....they proved fanciful and delightful and I enjoyed them every time I saw them. My gripes at the time were definitely wrong.

But, mainly I'm on a different frequency than those choosing our art.

I guess I feel the same way towards our art as I do the naming of schools. I prefer geographical themes/names, things that harken back to our heritage. Speaking of heritage, take a look at our downtown, a rather eclectic mix of new and old. We've not mixed our buildings well....downtown seems confused and un-pretty.

So why do we insist upon mixing our older heritage with modern art? The two just don't mix! Our art is out of place, like it was transported back from Columbia's future and discarded as waste since neutrons were low and it was too heavy to take back.

No, I have no desire to put up statues of ancient "heroes" or guys on horses or covered wagons.

But, this city's heritage is intertwined and based upon our universities. Knowledge is what we started out "selling" here, and we still sell it. Knowledge is our heritage, our creation if you will.

This community hinges on three things: knowledge, medicine, and insurance. We were founded on "knowledge".

Where is the art that honors THAT heritage, something that deliberately illustrates our past AND our future?

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams January 17, 2014 | 11:49 a.m.

Oh, by the way.....a bulletin board pin and/or the use of COMO in ANY design is really, really bad,

Horribly unimaginative, too.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.