WHAT OTHERS SAY: Let's watch other states manage legal marijuana first

Monday, January 20, 2014 | 6:00 a.m. CST; updated 10:23 a.m. CST, Monday, January 20, 2014

Let’s not be too hasty about legalizing marijuana in Missouri.

Attempts to ease marijuana restrictions for recreational or medicinal use are included in a proposed state law and in 13 initiative petitions cleared for the signature-gathering process.

The Missouri efforts follow separate legalization laws in two states, Colorado and Washington.

Proponents are prompted by the adage to “strike while the iron is hot.”

We encourage the opposite approach, particularly because if Missouri is patient, it can learn from an exemplary case of federalism in action.

Federalism is the constitutional concept outlined in 10th Amendment that powers not granted to or withheld from the federal government belong to the respective states, or the people.

Although federal law criminalizes the use and sale of marijuana, the Obama administration has elected not to pursue prosecution.

Because the U.S. government has elected to ignore defiant states, other states have a golden opportunity to observe the ramifications of legalizing marijuana.

Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis popularized the idea that, under federalism, a “state may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country.”

Two states have opted to serve as laboratories, conducting different experiments. Colorado permits people to grow their own marijuana plants; Washington does not.

Opponents of marijuana legalization believe these experiments are dangerous or destined to fail. “This is a bad experiment. It’s going to cost us in terms of social costs,” James Capra, chief of operations for the Drug Enforcement Administration, told the Washington Post.

And, although some doctors support limited use in some situations, other medical and mental health professionals have concerns about the long-term health hazards caused by marijuana use.

The states’ experiments are bound to reveal more about the social and health implications.

Rarely has a more compelling argument existed for Missouri to adopt a wait-and-see approach. With test cases elsewhere, proceeding with a potentially dangerous experiment here would be hasty, risky and foolish.

Copyright The Jefferson City News Tribune. Reprinted with permission.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Michael Williams January 20, 2014 | 5:46 p.m.

"Although federal law criminalizes the use and sale of marijuana, the Obama administration has elected not to pursue prosecution."


Nullification works.....If the feds don't pursue it.

Which, constitutionally, they indeed should. As it is, enforcing the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution is at the whim of whichever President and Attorney General is at the helm.

I hope y'all remember that, especially you, DaveR and ChrisK. You can't pick-and-choose, yet stay intellectually honest.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.