advertisement

GUEST COMMENTARY: To balance the budget, close the 'Paris Hilton' loophole

Wednesday, April 9, 2014 | 12:32 p.m. CDT; updated 3:44 p.m. CDT, Wednesday, April 9, 2014

If our leaders want to balance the budget, here’s a suggestion: Congress can scrap a new “Paris Hilton” giveaway that’s draining billions of federal tax dollars.

This giveaway takes the form of a complex tax loophole designed to circumvent the federal estate tax, one of the few ways a democratic society can reduce extreme wealth inequality.

The estate tax is a levy on inheritances that multi-millionaires and billionaires leave behind when they pass away. It affects only the wealthiest two out of every 1,000 U.S. taxpayers — individuals with at least $5.34 million to their name, or $10.68 million for a couple.

Estate-tax levels have bounced around for decades. In 2013, the government officially pegged it at 40 percent, one of the lowest levels since 1930. The effective (real-life) rate paid by these deep-pocketed estates amounted to less than half of that.

Estate taxes have historically raised substantial revenue from Americans with the greatest capacity to pay. A century ago, President Theodore Roosevelt — who inherited and squandered a fortune of his own — joined with steel magnate and philanthropist Andrew Carnegie — one of the richest men in the world at the time — to support establishing the modern version of the estate tax.

TR and Carnegie shared a goal of slowing the build-up of wealth dynasties, which they believed would corrode our democracy.

Although they succeeded, their goal remains elusive. We’re living in a new period of increasingly extreme wealth inequality.

The wealthiest 1 percent of households now own over 38 percent of all private wealth and almost half of all financial wealth, such as stocks and bonds. And our political system is being corrupted by billionaire political contributions facilitated by a string of Supreme Court rulings that toppled key campaign finance limits.

Perhaps you can recall that howling a decade back that it was time to “end the death tax”? An organized group of the super-wealthy spent millions lobbying to save themselves billions.

The heirs of Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton, whose combined wealth exceeds $100 billion, were among those clamoring against this supposedly unjust tax. The heirs of the fortunes left behind by the founders of Gallo wine and Mars candy joined the fray.

These scions of extremely wealthy families lobbied to kill the law. When they failed, they got to work on a plan B: gutting it. And America’s plutocrats prevailed.

The wealthiest 1/10th of 1 percent are no longer complaining about the estate tax because of a loophole Congress gave them. This loophole is big enough that even the richest Americans can dodge estate taxes before they pass away.

Take casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, who is worth $30 billion and recently made headlines by meeting personally with all the leading GOP presidential hopefuls in what the media deemed to be his own private primary.

Using this loophole, he’s already given his heirs $8 billion. This tax-free down payment on their inheritance will cost U.S. taxpayers $2.8 billion in estate taxes down the line.

How did he do that? Adelson used a scheme called the Granter Retained Annuity Trust to shuffle assets in and out of 30 trusts in order to game his taxes down.

Other early adapters to the loophole include Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, Dish Networks’ Charles Ergen, fashion designer Ralph Lauren and multiple Walton family members.

Richard Covey, the lawyer who pioneered the loophole, believes the loophole resulted in $100 billion in lost revenue since 2001, according to a Bloomberg News interview.

Not all wealthy Americans advocate dodging estate taxes. Bill Gates Sr. argues that those with substantial wealth in our nation have disproportionately benefited from the public investments and property protections our society makes.

This Tax Day, let’s demand that Congress close the billionaire tax loophole. By gutting the estate tax, it’s building massive dynasties that will make inequality in America even worse.

Chuck Collins is a senior scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies and co-editor of www.inequality.org. He is co-author, with Bill Gates Sr., of "Wealth and Our Commonwealth: Why America Should Tax Accumulated Fortunes." Distributed via OtherWords.org.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Richard Saunders April 9, 2014 | 4:59 p.m.

Extreme wealth inequality is best reduced by preventing its occurrence, NOT by trying to claw-back the loot with ever more tax laws (which only gives one an added monetary incentive to hire the best accountant to avoid those as well).

How is it prevented? Easy, just stop the NOT-Federal, NOT-Reserve criminal cartel from "printing money from thin air" which is then used to buy up government debt.

Money is NOT wealth. It is but a potential claim on the wealth that already exists. What does all of this debt-based money do? Why it pulls future demand into the present, at the expense of the future.

All of the growth of the money supply has done nothing but to act as a lever for the rich to ply wealth away from the poor, in the form of price inflation.

If you think food is expensive now, just wait until all of that "free money" sloshing around Wall St. finds it's way into farmland. Just recently a local farmer had to bid against a NYC investment fund for some bottom land. The fund bid it all the way up to $15.1k per acre. The farmer got it at $15.2.

So, they are ending up paying an insane amount of interest to the same banking system that bid against them with money obtained at near zero rates.

But hey, it's election season, so forget all about this and carry on with the divide and conquer rhetoric of "fair taxation."

Just don't complain when it doesn't work, okay?

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams April 9, 2014 | 8:49 p.m.

Richard: Ah, you were at that auction??????

I know that land. I covet it. I drive by it all the time.

I can't afford it. Best 380+ acre dirt from Glasgow to Jeff City. Howard County dirt.

Irrigated, too. 300+ bushels/corn per acre, here we come.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith April 10, 2014 | 6:08 a.m.

If whining about them could or would actually solve real or perceived problems, we'd have damned few of 'em.

We don't seem to have any lack of self help books; maybe an expert in the field of whining should write one on "how to whine our problems away." Even if poorly written, such a book would probably soar to #1 on the New York Times non-fiction book list.

Whining isn't considered a positive trait in children.

So there's no confusion, my above comments are NOT aimed at Richard Saunders or Michael Williams, John Schultz, Skip Yates, et al.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements