advertisement

City Council passes concrete median on College Avenue

Monday, May 19, 2014 | 11:29 p.m. CDT; updated 10:38 a.m. CDT, Tuesday, May 20, 2014

COLUMBIA — A vertical barrier will be built down the middle of College Avenue between the University Avenue and Rollins Street intersections in order to improve pedestrian safety.

Columbia City Council approved the design team's recommendation to install a corral rail on top of a raised median in the middle of a length of College Avenue at Monday's council meeting by a 4-2 vote.

The barrier, called Alternative A, will be accompanied by two High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk (H.A.W.K) signals between Rosemary Lane and Wilson Avenue as well as Wilson Avenue and Bouchelle Avenue. The signals are designed to allow pedestrians to cross busy streets safely while maintaining the flow of traffic.

According to the project's report, the plan approved will cost $750,000. The project will be funded by a Missouri Department of Transportation grant which will pay a maximum of $659,000 towards the project and the difference will be split between MU and the City of Columbia.

The purpose of the barrier and the two specialized crosswalks is to limit the number of pedestrians who cross College Avenue illegally at areas other than the designated crosswalks at the Rollins Street and University Avenue intersections.

“This is going to be inconvenient to people living in East Campus. But this is not a convenience issue, this is a safety issue,” Mayor Bob McDavid said. “This is a dangerous road. There is a death waiting to happen here.”

Benjamin Ross, a consulting engineer for Engineering Surveys and Services, said that an average of 2,500 people cross the street mid-block daily, which presents a serious safety risk for both pedestrians and drivers.

Installation of the median will remove left turn access from College Avenue onto Wilson Avenue and Rosemary Lane. It would also remove motorist's ability to turn left out of the East Campus neighborhood from Wilson and Bouchelle avenues and Rosemary Lane.

The loss of left turn access was a big concern for East Campus neighborhood residents and property owners.

“I’ve played the Frogger game on College. I totally get it. There are a lot of safety issues and I agree with that. But this barrier is going to open a whole new realm of safety problems we can’t even conceptualize,” Sarah Smith said.

Smith and others said the proposal will create traffic backups in the East Campus area as well as forcing more people to turn left at an already crowded intersection at Rollins Street and College Avenue. However, other residents were happy with council’s decision.

"I’m very pleased with what happened. There was a serious safety issue and this will help a lot," said Chad Phillips, campus and community relations chair for the Missouri Students Association. "While it might take away from the convenience of traffic, I think safety should be the number one issue, and I’m glad they took that into consideration."

A convoluted passage

The council decided to take action on the project because of concern about meeting the grant's Dec. 1 deadline of having the project bid out, but Alternative A's passage didn't come easily.

Sixth Ward Councilwoman Barbara Hoppe motioned for council to recommend Alternative D, which would install a H.A.W.K. system and promote education through the university, but would not include a median or prohibit left turns. That motion failed when it didn’t receive a second.

She then motioned for a landscaped median which would allow for left turns, as well as the H.A.W.K. systems. That motion eventually failed on a 3-3 vote with Hoppe, First Ward Councilwoman Ginny Chadwick and Fourth Ward Councilman Ian Thomas voting in favor. Third Ward Councilman Karl Skala as not present at the meeting.

Thomas moved to amend Hoppe’s second motion to remove the left turns, which was Alternative G as proposed by developers. That motion failed on the same 3-3 vote.

Chadwick motioned to table the issue until the next council meeting, which would allow the absent Skala to vote as well as give MoDOT time to answer if they would agree to fund Alternative G. That motion also failed 3-3.

MoDOT said in a letter to Public Works Director John Glascock that they preferred Alternatives A and B, though they presented eight design options in the report. Although the department recommended Alternative G after a 2009 study, it received the second lowest feasibility score out of the eight options and was not considered as effective during the final analysis.

Council doubted that MoDOT would approve funding Alternative G.

"There is nothing in their letter that says they would recommend a landscaped median," Nauser said. "I don’t believe MoDOT, in their financial situation, is going to approve having a landscaped median on this roadway that's going to create issues with plowing snow and maintenance."

The vote on Alternative A was approved with votes from McDavid, Second Ward Councilman Michael Trapp, Thomas, and Fifth Ward Councilwoman Laura Nauser. Many council members said that something had to be done now, which was why they supported the proposal.

“Option A is the only way we’re going to bring votes together to move this forward,” Trapp said. “I think it’s risking the lives of our college students to delay a complicated process which has been going on for a long time.”

Julie Nolfo, a traffic engineer who conducted the study on pedestrian traffic on College Avenue, said that she supported Alternative A because other options wouldn’t work as well.

“The pedestrian situation on College Avenue is one of the worst I’ve ever observed,” Nolfo said. “You need some sort of physical deterrent to bring them to these crosswalks and to use them. At that point we feel very confident they will be effective."

Residents and property owners disagreed, saying MoDOT suggested Alternatives A and B despite public desire for a landscape median.

“We in East Campus are uncomfortable with this policy that has gone on… I find this very upsetting and quite misleading,” said Janet Hammen, president of the East Campus Neighborhood Association. “I’m astounded at the attitude about these students and residents who live here that they will continue to jaywalk no matter what we do.”

Council was more concerned with safety than aesthetics and future traffic issues caused by the project.

"This is a public safety issue," Nauser said. "I don’t want it on my conscience two years down the road if some student stands in the [proposed] landscaped median crossing College Avenue and gets hit by a car."

Larry Hubbard, MU's director of planning and design construction, said Alternative A is supported by the university. Of the three current students who spoke, all were in favor of Alternative A.

“As students, I think we can all agree we’re going to vie for the most safe option,” MU student Syed Ejaz said. “If it’s something that provides safety, convenience and peace of mind for students crossing College Avenue, it’s an option we’d like to move forward with. That’s why we’re happy with what was voted on today.”

Methods to deal with the increased traffic on College Avenue were discussed, but would require more study and funding not provided by the grant. Construction will begin in May 2015 after local universities are finished with the spring semester.

 Supervising editor is Samuel Hardiman.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Tracy Greever-Rice May 20, 2014 | 9:03 a.m.

Let me make sure I have this scenario correct... jaywalkers - en masse - persistently ignore the law, refuse to walk to intersections, and refuse to cross with the light...

And the solution to that wholly self-created problem is to punish permanent residents and property owners by making their day-in-day-out lives untenable because they no longer have normal ingress and egress to their neighborhood???

So, once again, we're rewarding thoughtless, selfish behavior and punishing commitment and civic responsibility.

And... we're doing it in the ugliest manner possible, surrounding East Campus w/ metal bars. East Campus has now literally been turned into the 'Zou'.

What clever, thoughtful, long-term thinkers we have on this council???

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith May 20, 2014 | 9:38 a.m.

@ Tracy Greever-Rice:

Just as no good deed (according to the old saying) goes unpunished, we apparently can no longer expect, let alone require, responsible behavior.

We've truly become a "nation of ninnies." Can it get still worse? It can.

(Report Comment)
Richard Saunders May 20, 2014 | 11:35 a.m.

Myself, I'm still enjoying the image that the "City Council passes a median on College Ave."

Sounds painful, even without considering how convoluted it was.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith May 20, 2014 | 3:16 p.m.

@ Richard:

Sounds a bit like the original Autobahn in Germany, where - like the Pennsylvania East-West Turnpike, built during the same era - there was only a thin median strip between east and westbound lanes of traffic, except that on the Autobahn median at every 0.5 kilometers there was a small CONCRETE gravestone-like marker signifying your distance from a standard reference point located in Berlin.

The markers stuck just far enough above ground to hang up a Porsche or similar low slung auto that spun out into the median. OUCH! Some entrances and exits had cobblestone pavement: that could prove dicey - especially when the cobblestones were wet.

(Report Comment)
Mike Martin May 20, 2014 | 6:32 p.m.

Where are all these safety minded Council members and planners on all the students crossing the equally dangerous Providence Rd near the Grasslands every day??

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements