DEAR READER: That Washington team's name? You make the call

Friday, May 23, 2014 | 4:05 p.m. CDT; updated 1:16 p.m. CDT, Friday, September 12, 2014

Dear Reader,

OK, news fans. It’s time to put you in the editor’s seat and make some of the sometimes ticklish and hard decisions that come with publishing the equivalent of a book every day.

I’ll call this “You Make the Call” and capitalize it to make it more formal and important. Should I? You be the judge.

But we won’t start with anything so paltry as capitalizing common nouns. Let’s get something with teeth:

The scenario: You are a sports editor on shift Thursday night. The Associated Press moves an article that says half the U.S. Senate wants the NFL commissioner to change the name of the Washington football team because it’s a racist slur.

The executive editor recently announced the Missourian would no longer use the team's name in stories. But the AP piece is about the name. Taking it out meets the policy, but clarity suffers for any reader who doesn’t immediately know the name.

What do you do?

The outcome: The article published without the team name. It included a link to a Dear Reader letter that discussed the policy. A photo of the team mascot on a player’s helmet ran in the online edition. The print edition had a box that described the policy. There was no photo.

Second thoughts: The values at stake are pretty clear. Perpetuating racial and slurs is bad, but readers generally don’t like guessing games. The issue comes up periodically in deciding when it’s OK to use the N- word. In fact, it’s the subject of another sports controversy: The NFL this spring discussed penalizing players during games for saying “nigger” on the field.

Note that I used the whole word, just as I would have referred to the Washington Redskins — not in describing the team in general or a game, but when the controversy is over the word itself.

I find both words to be offensive. Others may not. That’s not the point: The context is. Using the R- word casually serves no good purpose. Using it to engender debate and understanding does.

Clarity trumps sensitivity in this case. But I can (and will) be second-guessed, just as I have questioned the decision of editors in the heat of moving a bucketful of copy on a busy Thursday night.

You make the call. What would you do?

But first, dear reader, a ruling from the judges committee (me): You can’t change the policy if you don’t like it.

That would be cheating.

Remember, you’re the editor in charge for the night, meaning you have to make thousands of news judgments, most without thinking about them for any significant amount of time. Overriding a policy is one of those decisions, but changing policy isn’t a deadline call.


Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Skip Yates May 24, 2014 | 4:10 p.m.

So, at what meaningfull point in your adult life did you suddenly find the name of the football team to be offensive to you? I find it amusing that a bunch of senators have the time to take this up with all the more important national issues going on at this time. Without reading the list, I assume that they all have a "D" behind their name. Yet, none of you seem to have any issue with the use of the "N" word in both speech and song among young African Americans. Rightfully, the team owner has the backbone to tell all you suddenly politically correct folks to go pound sand.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith May 24, 2014 | 5:04 p.m.


Future historians may sum up the LATE United States of America as having been a brilliant but ultimately failed experiment: founded by giants, but brought down not by some foreign power, or by actions of terrorists, or by any natural force, but by a bunch of mealy mouthed domestic pygmies.

Maybe it's appropriate we're discussing this on Memorial Day weekend. Why DID so many American service men and women, past and present, made the supreme sacrifice?

(Report Comment)
Skip Yates May 25, 2014 | 4:56 p.m.

Ellis: With the liberals screaming racism, from POTUS on down, at every chance they think it might work for them, I'm suprised they didn't decide this was a good time to go after the 'Ole Miss Rebels again.

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith May 25, 2014 | 11:15 p.m.


Maybe they haven't discovered the Hee-Haw Conference yet. Give them time to do that. :)

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.