advertisement

UPDATE: St. Louis challenges Missouri ban on gay marriage

Thursday, June 26, 2014 | 6:12 p.m. CDT; updated 10:45 p.m. CDT, Thursday, June 26, 2014
On Wednesday, newlywed couples, from left, David Gray and Tod Martin, Miranda Duschack and Mimo Davis, and Terry Garrett and Bruce Yampolsky, celebrate after St. Louis Recorder of Deeds Sharon Quigley Carpenter announced she had officially recorded their marriages in the Recorder of Deeds office at St. Louis City Hall.

This story has been updated with comments from the attorney general, the mayor and license recipients and with the attorney general asking for expedited court review of case.

ST. LOUIS — Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster said Thursday that he personally supports gay marriage but will defend a state constitutional ban against it after St. Louis officials issued marriage licenses to four same-sex couples at a City Hall ceremony.

MoreStory


Related Media

Related Articles

A judge denied Koster's request Thursday for a temporary restraining order against the gay marriages, but city officials said they won't issue any more marriage licenses to gay couples — at least until state or federal courts further resolve several pending challenges.

St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay said the four gay-marriage licenses were issued with the intent of triggering a legal test of Missouri's constitutional prohibition adopted by voters a decade ago. The licenses were issued on the same day that a U.S. appeals court panel in Denver ruled that states cannot prevent gay couples from marrying.

"Cities are strengthened by their families. I want St. Louis to be the sort of diverse and open place in which all families, gay and straight, choose to live, be creative and build businesses," Slay said. "I can't think of anything more beautiful. I can't think of anything more right."

Koster, a Democrat who is running for governor in 2016, said it is his responsibility to defend Missouri's laws and that local officials should not be taking actions in conflict with those laws.

"While I personally support the goal of marriage equality, my duty as attorney general is to defend the laws of the state of Missouri," Koster said in a written statement. "While many people in Missouri have changed their minds regarding marriage equality, Missourians have yet to change their constitution."

The four couples — six men and two women — were married Wednesday night in Slay's office in a ceremony presided over by a municipal judge as well as a rabbi and priest. The couples joined Slay and other city officials at a Thursday morning press conference to discuss the move.

"Being recognized as a married couple is so amazing," said John Durnell, 63, who has been with his partner Richard Eaton, 75, for nearly four decades.

Tod Martin said his marriage to David Gray formalizes a 22-year relationship that began soon after both moved to the city after attending Vanderbilt University

"We've seen ourselves as an old married couple for quite some time," said Martin, deputy chief of staff for Democratic U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill. "(The city) helped make that actually a reality last night."

Slay told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that city officials issued the marriage licenses "to force this issue and to get the law settled" on whether Missouri's gay marriage ban is legal.

"If we weren't doing this, no other city in Missouri would," said Slay, who has three gay siblings, including a brother who got married in New York because he couldn't in St. Louis.

"He didn't want to wait," the mayor said. "He's happier than he's ever been in his entire life."

While denying Koster's request for a temporary restraining order, St. Louis Circuit Judge Rex Burlison noted that city officials have agreed not to issue more marriage licenses. The judge is to hear arguments at a later date on whether to grant an injunction against the same-sex marriages.

Later Thursday, Koster asked the judge to set a date between July 16 and July 31 to hear arguments on the legal motions, followed by a trial date in the first half of August if necessary.

Missouri voters in 2004 approved a state constitutional amendment limiting marriage to one man and one woman — the first such measure enacted nationally after the Massachusetts Supreme Court permitted gay marriage in that state. The Missouri ballot measure passed with 70 percent of the vote.

Since then, there has been no effort by Republican legislative leaders to reconsider the gay marriage ban. But Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon said in February that it should be put to another vote, and that he would support repealing it.

Nixon's comments came after the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit in February seeking to force Missouri to recognize the out-of-state marriages of several same-sex couples.

Last year, Nixon announced that Missouri would accept joint income tax returns from legally married gay couples, mirroring a new policy by the federal Internal Revenue Service.

That prompted a lawsuit from representatives of Baptist and family policy organizations asserting that Nixon's policy violates Missouri's constitutional provision recognizing only marriages between men and women. A judge denied a temporary restraining order in April against Nixon's policy but the case is still pending in Cole County Circuit Court.

The governor's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday on the St. Louis decision.

 

 


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements