advertisement

GEORGE KENNEDY: Events, years apart, act as reminder of racial strife, unrest

Thursday, August 21, 2014 | 6:20 p.m. CDT; updated 5:31 p.m. CDT, Thursday, August 28, 2014

The riot, which began after a white cop shot an unarmed black teenager, was in its second night.

I stood 20 feet or so from a line of protesters, who were all black, mainly young and male, and growing increasingly angry. I looked to my right. There, sitting on the back of a Jeep, a National Guardsman who looked to be a teenager himself had his finger on the trigger of a loaded and cocked .30 caliber machine gun. His weapon was pointed at the protesters. His eyes were wide with nervous tension.

One threatening move and men would die. I’ve seldom been so scared.

Somehow, the moment passed without bloodshed; but the hostility did not ease on either side of the racial line.  

Ferguson 2014? No; this was Tampa, Fla., in the summer of 1967. It was one of many outbursts in a violent year in a troubled decade.

The current headline-grabbing eruption in a predominantly black St. Louis suburb reminded me of that hot summer and the one that followed. It should remind us all of how far we’ve come as a society in nearly half a century – and how far we have to go.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch had a good analysis Sunday, asking why Ferguson had exploded. The answers were predictable: Bad relations between police and citizenry, joblessness, crowded and rundown housing, poverty and a cohort of young men with not much hope and not much to lose.

That was almost exactly the situation then in Tampa. When I returned, almost a year later, to report a follow-up story, I found that there had been a lot of talk of change but little that had touched the lives of the most disaffected. What will Ferguson look like next summer?

After the Tampa riot and a bigger, bloodier one in Detroit, the Miami Herald, where I worked at the time, conducted a survey of Miami’s black residents. More presciently than we could know, we called it “our pre-riot survey.”

What we learned was pretty much what the Post-Dispatch reporters found in their unscientific survey of Ferguson. The powder was there, in the Liberty City and Overtown sections of Miami. All that was lacking was the spark.

That came in the summer of 1968, as the Republican national convention a few miles away on Miami Beach nominated Richard Nixon for president. A protest meeting drew an over-response from heavily armed police, and the powder ignited.

Summoned from Convention Hall, I found myself standing in another street, an angry crowd behind me, watching a white governor call futilely for calm and promise unconvincingly that grievances would be addressed.

Neither Claude Kirk in Miami nor Jay Nixon, in Ferguson, had enough credibility to quiet the protests or deter the looters.

We knew then, as we know now, many of the root causes of urban unrest. We knew then, as we know now, that there is always a criminal element ready to use legitimate protest as an excuse to loot, burn and shoot. We knew then, as we know now, that white people in general have much more trust and confidence in police than black people do.

I can’t help wondering what would have happened if we had moved as effectively to address the causes of unrest as we have moved to equip our police with armored personnel carriers and heavy weapons.

Martin Chambers was 19 when a Tampa officer named James Calvert shot him in the back. Michael Brown was 18 when Ferguson officer Darren Wilson shot him six times. Both were suspected of minor crimes. Neither was armed.

Two deaths 47 years apart have triggered disturbingly similar reactions. We humans pride ourselves on being able to learn from experience. The evidence unfolding in Ferguson makes me wonder about that.

Remember Rodney King? He was the black man whose brutal beating at the hands of Los Angeles police led to another riot in 1992 when a jury acquitted the assaulters. He famously asked the plaintive question: “Can we all get along?”

Even today, the only honest answer seems to be “Not yet.”

George Kennedy is a former managing editor for the Missourian. He writes a weekly column for the Missourian.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Ellis Smith August 22, 2014 | 8:06 a.m.

George,

Americans tend to have short memories regarding past events - good events as well as bad. In some cases this may be a good thing (not holding perennial hatreds over past situations, for example) but in the situation you cite our lack of memory isn't a good thing.

I have a conundrum for you, George. Regarding a "police state," if we are moving toward a police state*, is that increasing the incidence of riots, OR is increasing incidence of riots facilitating movement toward a police state? Maybe six of one and a half-dozen of the other, George?

Conundrum No. 2: Why are those Americans who advocate ever larger and more intrusive government complaining about a coming police state? Do they not understand that one situation has typically gone hand-in-hand with the other? We most definitely do not need to leave the Western Hemisphere to find plenty of examples.

When citizens can't or won't do for themselves those things necessary to govern themselves, then - sooner or later - someone will take over and do that FOR them, and those nice folks aren't apt to be "gentle" after having done so.

*- For a study of on-and-off police states AND inability of self governace I recommend Argentina in the 20th century. Argentina is NOT lacking in natural resources, manufacturing and business capabilities, a skilled labor force, educational opportunities or in the arts, music and literature, but it has one of the most [expletive definitely deleted] up political situations in the modern world! Argentina SHOULD be another Canada (population, resources and human capabilities). IS it?

(Report Comment)
George Kennedy August 22, 2014 | 4:45 p.m.

Ellis --

As always, thanks for reading and reacting. Not sure I see the parallel between Ferguson and Argentina, but I agree that we Lefties aren't always perfectly logical.

gk

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith August 22, 2014 | 5:30 p.m.

George,

The "parallel" can possibly be best expressed as this question: Isn't ONE "Argentina" in this hemisphere more than enough?

Let's beware of OUR establishing a second one.

See also Richard Saunders' comment (access it from the currently listed ones) concerning those who pretend. Maybe if we pretend they don't exist, our problems will simply melt away. Think so?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements