advertisement

Mother urges insurance coverage for hearing impaired children

Thursday, February 19, 2004 | 12:00 a.m. CST; updated 4:15 p.m. CDT, Friday, July 11, 2008

JEFFERSON CITY - Jody Pacheco, mother of 7-year-old Augustine and 5-year-old Wayne, both with a hearing loss, testified Tuesday in favor of a bill aimed at providing insurance coverage for hearing aids to children up to age 19.

Calling hearing impairment "an invisible disability," Pacheco argued before the House Financial Services Committee that it made sound economic sense to provide such coverage.

"Treatment of hearing loss can significantly reduce the need for more intensive intervention in the child's future," Pacheco said.

"The evidence clearly shows that with proper amplification and appropriate rehabilitation, children with hearing loss will require fewer services throughout their lifetimes, attain their optimal potential and grow to lead productive lives and make valuable contributions to society."

Under the bill, an insurance policy would have to cover replacement of a child's hearing aids every three years with a cost limit of $1,250 per hearing aid.

Rep. Danielle Moore, R-Fulton, the bill's sponsor, said that passing the bill makes educational sense.

"Children who cannot hear certainly cannot learn," Moore said.

Rep. Chuck Graham, D-Columbia, a co-sponsor of the bill, said it was critical because that's when children are forming their language skills, which is essential for their educational and developmental success.

Gary Maienschein, director of government affairs for Blue Cross and Blue Shield in Missouri, was the only person to testify in opposition to the bill.

Maienschein said his organization was against any kind of mandated benefits. He was hopeful that some kind of "middle ground" would be found.

"In the past, a number of mandated benefits have been changed to reflect the requirements that insurance companies offer," Maienschein said. "And under this coverage, the buyer would be allowed to decide whether he or she wants to buy that coverage. And also we would suggest that perhaps individual insurers be allowed to be exempted from this."

Graham said he was hopeful the bill would pass this year, considering the assembly was close to reaching an agreement with some of the health insurance companies to let it pass last year.

The committee took no immediate action on the measure.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements