advertisement

Paige scolded over school rules

At a Columbia forum, the secretary of education and the No Child Left Behind law drew fire.
Tuesday, April 20, 2004 | 12:00 a.m. CDT; updated 3:54 p.m. CDT, Monday, July 21, 2008

Rod Paige, America’s foremost education policymaker, sat in the shadows of Rock Bridge High School’s cavernous auditorium Monday, fending off attacks over No Child Left Behind — a broad, sweeping education law passed in 2001.

Paige took copious notes. He looked right at his critics. And he said the same thing — many times.

“This is a positive law, designed so that every student can achieve,” he said.

“No Child Left Behind empowers students and teachers,” he said.

“This law strengthens accountability, and is not tilted to one ideology or the other,” he said.

“Our purpose is unchanged: We will make America better through education using bipartisan tactics,” he said.

As for the accusation that tests will become the solitary focus of America’s education system:

“Testing will make teachers better,” Paige offered. And again: “Testing informs the instructional process.”

And to a particularly rancorous or leading question, he offered this response, on several occasions:

“Don’t be fooled by the nature of the debate. Democracy is not tidy.”

Phyllis Chase, superintendent of Columbia’s public schools and the second to speak, said the federal law produced misleading statistics which, she said, only undermined community support for schools. She said many of the Columbia schools that fell short of No Child Left Behind guidelines only failed because one group failed — not indicative of the rest of the building.

Where was the reward, she asked, for districts that performed up to the rigorous standards that No Child Left Behind required. Finally, she said, the federal government was underfunding — or not funding at all — the major programs that school districts need.

Chase’s complaints echoed the major complaints nationwide against No Child Left Behind. But Chase said after the forum that she was left feeling somewhat unsatisfied by Paige’s response.

“He’s aware of the issues,” she said, after the meeting. “But he didn’t answer all of my concerns.”

If the participants in Monday’s forum were upset with the law’s philosophy, many were downright enraged over the state of federal funding.

[photo]

Matt Cone, a social studies teacher at Rock Bridge High School, voices his concerns about testing and teachers’ roles under the No Child Left Behind Act. (SARAH KIRCHHOFF/Missourian)

Just a few weeks ago, 70 school districts asked their residents to pass tax increases; about 80 percent of them did it. The critics continued, wondering how the federal government can justify shifting the funding burden to local voters.

Rod Paige had this reply: “This is no unfunded mandate.”

More than once in his Monday presentation, Paige rebutted charges that the federal Department of Education and the Bush administration are or have been unresponsive to the complaints of educators.

He cited their flexibility when they reworked four core areas of No Child Left Behind since November. They eased up on testing requirements for students learning English and special-education students, he said.

Paige said that he had been through 46 states — and Missouri twice. Just a few weeks ago, he made a similar stop in St. Louis.

If Paige was on a mission to show his willingness to listen, Rock Bridge High School Principal Bruce Brotzman said he didn’t see it. After everyone emptied out of the massive auditorium, Brotzman shared this observation ofPaige — the leading education policymaker in the nation:

“He didn’t respond.”


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements