Lawmakers say military is overworked

Bipartisan concern is voiced that armed forces desperately need time off.
Thursday, July 8, 2004 | 12:00 a.m. CDT; updated 5:06 a.m. CDT, Sunday, July 13, 2008

WASHINGTON — In a bipartisan show of concern that the military is dangerously overworked, lawmakers said Wednesday the Pentagon is stretching troops to their limit and perhaps undermining the nation’s future force.

Amid worries the high level of deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan could discourage potential new service members, Rep. John McHugh, R-N.Y., said it was not reassuring that most reserve components were falling below their recruiting goals for the year.

As of May 31, the Army National Guard was reported at 88 percent, the Air National Guard at 93 percent and the Air Force Reserve at 91 percent of their goals.

“We’re taxing our part-time soldiers, our Guard and Reserves nearly to the breaking point,” said Rep. Ike Skelton of Missouri, top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee. “We have to be aware that the families back home are paying a significant price. We don’t want to break the force.”

The Army recently decided to deploy units that have been used to train other soldiers. Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., the committee chairman, noted the ratio of reserves to active duty soldiers in Iraq is increasing and he said he was concerned that troops are not getting enough turnaround time back in the states.

Defense Department officials testified at a committee hearing about troop rotations in Iraq and Afghanistan following last week’s announcement that the Army was calling up soldiers who already served in the Middle East.

Stretched by war needs, the Pentagon already had declared a “stop-loss” to prevent troops from leaving once they have finished their obligation.

The Army in April broke a promise to some active-duty units that they would not have to serve more than 12 months in Iraq. It also has extended the tours of other units, including some in Afghanistan.

Some lawmakers are seeking a permanent increase in the size of the military. But Pentagon personnel chief David Chu said defense officials can make better use of those in the service by reorganizing brigades, making sure uniformed personnel are not performing jobs civilians could do and temporarily increasing troops levels with stop-loss and other devices.

“I really think you’re wrong,” Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., told Chu, stating the Pentagon is doing a superb job of managing its resources. “In the end, it does take people, and you are using people pretty hard right now,” Cole said.

For the first time since the 1991 Gulf War, the Army is forcing thousands of former soldiers back into uniform, a reflection of the strain on the service of the campaign in Iraq and the fight against terrorism.

More than 5,600 former soldiers will be assigned to National Guard and Reserve units scheduled to deploy to Iraq or Afghanistan, officials announced last week.

People in the Individual Ready Reserve are distinct from the National Guard and Reserve because they do not perform regularly scheduled training and are not paid as reservists.

They are eligible to be recalled in an emergency because their active duty stints did not complete the service obligation in their enlistment contracts.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.