advertisement

War in Iraq takes toll on approval ratings

Monday, August 30, 2004 | 12:00 a.m. CDT; updated 2:44 a.m. CDT, Monday, July 21, 2008

NEW YORK — War is hell on a presidency. And it plays havoc with presidential campaigns.

President Bush led the nation through the Sept. 11 attacks, against the Taliban and into Iraq — three defining moments that have brought his political fortunes full circle to the same middling job approval rating he had Sept. 10, 2001. At the opening of his nominating convention, supporters can’t help but wonder how much stronger Bush would be politically had he kept the war on terrorism out of Iraq.

“War is hard,” Bush adviser Karen Hughes said. “Even when it’s right, it’s difficult. It takes a political toll.”

The numbers show it:

  • By a 3-to-1 margin, people think the war in Iraq increased rather than decreased the threat of terrorism.
  • Six in 10 say Bush does not have a clear plan for bringing the Iraq war to a successful resolution.
  • A total of 969 U.S. troops have died in Iraq, including 831 since Bush stood before a “Mission Accomplished” sign and declared an end to major combat on May 1, 2003.

Nearly 40 percent of the slain soldiers came from political battleground states. In the three most critical states to the president’s re-election bid — Pennsylvania, Florida and Ohio — 128 soldiers have died in Iraq, or about 13 percent of the total.

“I’m just not sure I can trust him anymore,” said Chris Flaig, a Philadelphia rental-car agency worker who voted for Bush in 2000. Flaig said he knows two soldiers in Iraq and is friends with somebody who knew a slain soldier. Such few degrees-of-separation stories come up in almost any conversation with swing voters such as Flaig.

“This war colors everything,” he said. “It may tip my vote against him.”

But it may not, because like many voters, Flaig said he’s unimpressed with presidential rival John Kerry’s stand on Iraq. He doesn’t understand it because the Democrat hasn’t always been consistent, he said.

Kerry, a four-term Massachusetts senator, voted against the 1991 Persian Gulf War led by Bush’s father. Gearing up for a presidential run, Kerry voted in 2002 to give Bush the authority to invade Iraq, when about 60 percent of the public supported the president’s job performance, the war on terror was politically popular and Democrats didn’t want to look weak on defense.

As the invasion approached, Kerry accused Bush of rushing to war without the backing of allies. Advisers said he felt political pressure from rival Howard Dean, who had tapped a deep vein of anti-war sentiment in the Democratic Party. Months later, at the height of his primary fight against Dean, Kerry voted against an $87 billion aid package for Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Republican incumbent wants to raise doubts about Kerry’s strength and credibility, particularly among voters who say they are open to persuasion. In Associated Press-Ipsos polling, two-thirds of persuadable voters disapprove of Bush’s handling of Iraq. Yet those same up-for-grabs voters are just as likely as other Americans to find Bush to be strong and honest.

While they concede Iraq has hurt Bush politically, his advisers say the war has focused voters on national security, an issue that favors Republicans and incumbents, rather than traditionally Democratic issues such as education and health care.

In Pew Research Center polling, 51 percent of Americans approved of Bush’s job performance just before the Sept. 11 attacks. As he stands before a divided nation, accepting the Republican nomination four miles from where the twin towers stood, the president’s job-approval rating is where it was just before the attacks. About half the nation approves, and about half doesn’t. Both candidates have suffered collateral damage from the war.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements