Workers’ comp bill revives

Bill reducing workers’ compensation has been tied up in talks.
Wednesday, February 9, 2005 | 12:00 a.m. CST; updated 5:45 p.m. CDT, Friday, July 18, 2008

JEFFERSON CITY — Informal negotiations between a handful of Senate Republicans and Democrats will probably push a bill to reduce the state worker’s compensation program to the floor today.

The bill’s sponsor, Sen. John Loudon, R-St. Louis County, said the talks came at the request of the governor’s office and were aimed at paving the way for passage of a bill that would restrict worker’s compensation claims to injuries in which work was the “prevailing cause” and exempt injuries of an unknown cause and injuries that result from a preexisting condition.

“Everyone can empathize with the injured worker, and so, the whole goal and the focus of this is to try to reduce the gray areas and make sure we take care of the legitimately injured workers,” Loudon said.

The bill was the first one filed for the 2005 session and had been moving quickly through the legislative process until the negotiations. Tim Green, D-St. Louis County, said it was difficult to determine the status of the negotiations because leadership has decided to send the bill to the floor today and finish floor debate by Thursday.

“If we were going to do this properly, I guess we would have done it in committee, but we were rushed into voting it out,” Green said.

Unlike past debates on worker’s compensation, Loudon said many of the most contentious issues, such as the definition of accidents and abrogating circumstances, are not the focus of the negotiations. Instead, they are focusing on how liberally the law will be construed, whether there will be a discussion on the qualifications of administrative judges and how to handle payments when a company has gone bankrupt.

Despite the meetings, lawmakers did not anticipate a sedate or abridged debate. “It’s hard to discuss worker’s comp and not have it be lively because there are a lot of emotional issues involved and strong opinions on both sides,” Loudon said. “But it looks like we have the most conciliatory stance on both sides that we’ve seen in a long time.”

Green declined to comment on the specifics of the negotiations but said the floor debate will be the sounding post for flushing out details of the legislation.

“It’s hard to say where we are right now,” he said. “But it’s like a television show: You’ll have to wait for the next episode.”

The curbing of worker’s compensation has the support of Republican leadership in the General Assembly and from Gov. Matt Blunt. Proponents have argued that current benefits are too costly for employers and drive business out of the state while critics argue the changes would eliminate reimbursement for legitimate work injuries.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.