advertisement

Mo. insurers paid out less in malpractice

Tuesday, July 26, 2005 | 12:00 a.m. CDT; updated 6:03 a.m. CDT, Saturday, July 19, 2008

ST. LOUIS — Medical malpractice insurers paid out significantly less in claims to Missouri physicians last year, but continued to raise the premiums they charge doctors, according to a new study.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners compiled the report from information insurance carriers submitted for last year.

A key figure for insurers is the loss ratio — the ratio between the amount the company projects it will ultimately pay out and the amount of premium it takes in. The study showed that the loss ratio for Missouri malpractice carriers dropped by nearly 35 percent last year.

In Missouri, premiums increased 8.4 percent as direct losses dropped 26 percent.

“Overall, I would say the improvement is significant,” said Doug Ommen, deputy director for the Missouri Insurance Department. But he said he would not speculate on the reason.

The report also draws no conclusions.

Calvin Call, executive director of the Missouri Insurance Coalition, said he doesn’t dispute the report’s figures.

“They show an industry on the mend,” he said. “You’re going to see fewer rate increases and, in some cases, rate decreases.”

The insurance industry maintains that virtually all studies comparing premiums to payouts are flawed because they don’t take into account future expenses that can only be estimated. The studies also exclude hospitals that self-insure.

Republican Gov. Matt Blunt signed legislation earlier this year that imposes new restrictions on medical malpractice and other injury lawsuits. Among other things, it caps damages for pain and suffering at $350,000 in medical malpractice cases.

Blunt and Republican legislators contend the law, which takes effect Aug. 28, should help lower medical malpractice premiums for physicians.

But Jay Angoff, an attorney who is a former Missouri insurance commissioner, said the recent report shows that “the facts are 180 degrees different” from what backers of the new law had argued.

The report “means the industry was wildly, breathtakingly profitable in 2004,” Angoff said.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements