advertisement

Mandatory jail time proposed for sex offenders

Attorneys fear 25-year minimum sentence could limit cases.
Sunday, April 2, 2006 | 12:00 a.m. CST; updated 4:48 a.m. CDT, Tuesday, July 22, 2008

JEFFERSON CITY — Legislators in Missouri and throughout the nation have pushed to keep sex offenders locked away longer through mandatory minimum sentences, but some prosecutors say that broad minimums will result in more offenders on the streets.

St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch has warned legislators since the beginning of the current legislative session about going too far with efforts to crack down on sex offenders. Dozens of sex offender bills have been filed by members of both chambers.

McCulloch said the majority of these crimes involve offenders who know their victims either through family or friends. As a result, the mandatory 25-year minimums can keep people from reporting the names of loved ones to police.

Due in part to McCulloch’s lobbying, legislators have limited application of the 25-year minimum to three crimes — forcible rape, sodomy and sexual trafficking — in cases in which the victims are children under age 12.

McCulloch said he does not disagree with these sentences, but he expressed concern with one proposal recently passed by the Senate. The provision would redefine all sex with a child under the age of 12 as forcible rape, eliminating the possibility for offenders to plea to the lesser crime of statutory rape.

McCulloch slammed the proposal, calling it unconstitutional. “The Senate bill severely hinders the ability of prosecutors to gain the cooperation of the family,” he said.

The Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, Matt Bartle, sponsored the bill with the provision that raises McCulloch’s objections. Bartle, R-Lee’s Summit, disagreed with assertions that his bill is unconstitutional, but said new laws are often challenged in court.

“If we begin allowing the fact that a new provision will be challenged to discourage us from passing a new provision, we’d never pass any new measures,” Bartle said.

Since the 1990s, states have passed bills that lengthen sentences, said Blake Harrison of the National Conference of State Legislatures. Harrison, who monitors criminal justice legislation throughout the country, said last year was the biggest year for state legislatures enacting sex offender laws.

Susan Broderick, an attorney for the National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse, said that sweeping 25-year minimum sentences, such as those Florida passed last year under the “Jessica Lunsford Act,” can make it more difficult for prosecutors to convict offenders.

“The one-size-fits-all approach is fine in theory, but not all cases are going to get the same result,” Broderick said.

Broderick gave an example of a child, who cannot testify in court, in cases where there is no other evidence that a sex offense occurred. The offender is less likely to plead guilty and a jury is less likely to convict when there is no option of a shorter jail sentence, she said.

“In those types of cases, some prosecutorial discretion is necessary, and sometimes a plea to less jail time — with condition of registration as a sex offender — would be a better result than a straight acquittal,” Broderick said.

Rep. Scott Lipke, R-Jackson, is chairman of the Crime Prevention and Public Safety Committee that hears testimony on sex offender legislation. He said he consulted with judges, law enforcement officers and attorneys about the proposals.

He said the Senate’s proposal to eliminate the possibility of statutory rape for people who have sex with a child under the age of 12 will be the main point of contention when the House and Senate work to put together a sex offender legislation package.

“The prosecutors are the ones that have to live by the laws that we pass,” Lipke said. “The goal is to be tough on sex offenders, but leave prosecutors with the tools available to them to get as many convictions, so that we can get as many people on the registry that need to be on there.”

Other laws that have moved forward in the House and the Senate would strengthen penalties against repeat offenders and those who fail to register, add to the list of people who must be monitored electronically and keep some registered offenders off school property.

Other legislation to keep registered offenders out of some state jobs and to allow law enforcement to search the homes of sex offenders without a warrant if a child is reported missing within a three-mile radius, did not move beyond discussion.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements