advertisement

Library users suggest leasing space

Thursday, May 24, 2007 | 12:00 a.m. CDT; updated 11:20 a.m. CDT, Friday, July 18, 2008

The amount of the property tax that pays for the 2000 Columbia Public Library renovation is 23 cents. A story below incorrectly stated the amount of the tax.

Wednesday night, Jim Ritter, moderator of the Daniel Boone Regional Library Board’s Election Review Committee meetings, faced a group that had convened to discuss why a property tax increase on the April 3 ballot failed by such a wide margin. The tax would have funded two new Boone County libraries.

The libraries would have been built in Ashland and at the Boone County Fairgrounds. Most of the 10 residents in attendance lived within the city limits of Columbia but outside of the Columbia Library District.

The library district includes all of the land within the 1965 city boundaries, while the Boone County Library District consists of everything outside those limits. The proposed 21-cent property tax would have affected only those residents living within the Boone County Library District.

Columbia residents that live outside the 1965 city limits would have paid the proposed 21-cent tax even though they wouldn’t have been likely to use either the Ashland or the northern Boone County branches.

“I’ve talked to my neighbors, and I heard everyone say that they will never vote to pay for any library in Ashland,” said Kevin Begley, a new Columbia resident.

The library board reminded residents that anyone living outside the 1965 Columbia city limits does not pay the 29-cent property tax that funds the 2000 Columbia Public Library renovation.

“What you’re talking about are things that most Columbians don’t know,” Begley said.

Many in attendance advised the library board to raise more public awareness to help sell its plans to the community. Others cited a distrust the community has after the Columbia Public Library was renovated.

“There is a lack of credibility between the population and the library board,” said Steve Callus, a Columbia resident. “The building promoted wasn’t exactly what we got. A lot of people believe that.”

Many Columbia residents don’t think that the word “renovation” is correct for a project that resulted in the library being almost torn to the ground.

Tom Richards, the organizer of the Election Review Committee, said that the library board got a few new ideas from Wednesday’s meeting, including the suggestion to try to lease several small buildings in different locations.

“Each of these meetings is going to have a different twist,” he said. “We’re going to have to come up with a plan that fits the needs of everyone.”

The Daniel Boone Regional Library is encouraging people to send any comments they have on the issue to comments@dbrl.org.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements