advertisement

Air show group should give up costly fight

Sunday, June 3, 2007 | 12:00 a.m. CDT; updated 12:01 p.m. CDT, Friday, July 11, 2008

The Memorial Day weekend air show has become a Boone County tradition. I’ve never attended, but I’ve always thought it was a nice way to get people out to trample the grass growing on the runways of Englewood International Airport. The patriotic, even militaristic, nature of the activities hasn’t bothered me much. What always did bother me, though, was the unconstitutional censoring of protesters’ First Amendment rights. It was not only illegal, but also unwise, for the city of Columbia to conspire with the air show organizers to forbid a hardy handful of antiwar activists from handing out leaflets and circulating petitions.

So back in 2004, when the American Civil Liberties Union sued the city and the Salute to Veterans Corp., the organizing group, I thought the defendants would lose and would deserve to lose. For once, I was right on both counts. As you’ll recall, Columbia’s own federal Judge Nanette Laughrey first issued a temporary injunction, in 2005, and then in 2006 made the injunction permanent.

It wasn’t a complete victory for free speech, because for some reason I’m not smart enough to understand, Laughrey said the protesters named in the suit, veteran activists Bill Wickersham and Maureen Doyle, should be allowed to pass out their leaflets but couldn’t collect petition signatures.

Despite that, it was a big step in the right direction. Both the city and Salute to Veterans wrong-headedly appealed. Expensive mistake. It’s one thing to be stubborn in defending your principles. I’ve occasionally been accused of that myself. But when the principle at issue is so clearly indefensible, stubbornness becomes a costly vice.

That turned out to be the case when in March, the federal Court of Appeals upheld Laughrey’s decision. The court has also ordered that Salute to Veterans pay the ACLU’s legal fees and costs, which so far add up to more than $200,000. The meter continues to run because the organization has now decided to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

(Apparently, the city’s contract with the group relieves the city of any part of the lawyers’ bill. Still, I thought it was kind of funny when City Attorney Fred Boeckman complained that the ACLU’s St. Louis attorney charges $400 an hour and noted that the city’s advocate was only charging $110. Maybe this is one of those situations where you really do get what you pay for.)

At least the city finally had the good sense to drop out of this whole misguided appeal process. I’d like to think that’s because of a belated recognition that governments not only can’t but shouldn’t participate in restricting citizens’ rights to speak freely, especially on topics as important as war and peace.

Now Salute to Veterans should do the same. St. Louis Post-Dispatch columnist Bill McClellan wrote a piece the other day that made the point eloquently. He noted that the right to dissent is one of the most important glories of America that our military serves to defend. As a lower-case veteran myself, though one who never heard a shot fired in anger, I think Bill had it right.

Some battles are better lost.

George Kennedy is a former managing editor at the Missourian.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Richard Hayden June 4, 2007 | 11:41 a.m.

Won’t Ever Get it!
One thing that the air show is not about is a debate on military readiness. We have and will have a strong defense, Congress funds it and our future depends on it. “Battles lost” you say, yes, but won mainly by the attorneys receiving compensation between the sides on this silly and childish conflict. Honor, gratitude and remembering sacrifices made by a few for the many, this is the constant value of the Salute volunteers I have proudly been involved with throughout the community. These values are not compatible with trash, malign and divide. If we were in a perfect world they would hang in the throat of “free speech”. The paradox that we have that allows some to burn our flag but later hide behind it makes us unique in the world; don’t expect all of us to endorse dying to protect that uniqueness while being spit on simply due to “free speech”. Mutually exclusive remarks like:
we support our troops but not the War ring hollow in the ears of our soldiers but of course you are free to do that and free to be wrong as well.
Get out an have your very own signature drive, your own event, show movies, hold hands, most of all enjoy the freedom to do that because those that we choose to honor and remember have sacrificed more than holding petition clipboards for a weekend. “I’ve never attended, but I’ve always thought it was a nice way to get people out to trample the grass” “It wasn’t a complete victory for free speech, because for some reason I’m not smart enough to understand,” Thanks for revealing this, don’t change now! “As a lower-case veteran myself, though one who never heard a shot fired in anger” The words you use here do not entitle you to a free pass, or qualify you in some special way! I have heard former veterans now choosing to trash our military allude to some secrete they now possess that gives them the right to change our minds for us? Practically speaking this debate resembles the one over breakfast between the chicken and the pig; one is involved while the other is committed. Hug and honor veterans, even if they now are disillusioned by their former service.
Lastly, we can all just hum “peace” together out loud until we have it, our national budget would over time be vastly improved since the debt we now owe our veterans would disappear.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements