Council slows down annexation

Decision on mobile home parks is put off until August after residents speak out
Tuesday, July 3, 2007 | 12:00 a.m. CDT; updated 10:15 a.m. CDT, Wednesday, July 16, 2008

While noticeably absent from the last public hearing, the voices of residents from Sunset and Ed’s mobile home parks were heard by the Columbia City Council at its meeting Monday night.

The council tabled its decision on the annexation and rezoning of the two parks, hoping to give the property owners and city staff time to find a compromise that addressed the residents’ concerns.

Ron Netemeyer, managing partner of Whirlwind Properties LLC, applied for annexation into the city of Columbia and planned commercial zoning for almost 21 acres off Lenoir Street southeast of Columbia, where his company operates the two parks.

The application first went to the Columbia Planning and Zoning Commission on May 24, where it received a 6-0 recommendation for approval. Then, on June 18, Columbia City Council held a public hearing on the issue.

None of the park residents spoke at the first hearing. Some, like Carl Miller, said they had no idea the meeting was even taking place.

The two main concerns that have been raised throughout the process are the impact annexation would have on the Columbia Police Department, who would be responsible for patrolling the area, and the future of the parks, which combined have more than 130 lots. Planned commercial zoning means that the property is intended for commercial use, but any changes would have to be approved by the council. Netemeyer said he does not plan to close or sell the parks in the near future. However, a city report on the issue said it is likely the land will be sold and developed after annexation and rezoning.

At Monday night’s hearing, many residents and community members did show up to voice their unease.

Mary Hussmann, of Grass Roots Organizing, said she spoke on behalf of families living in the parks who had contacted her group.

“Real, live, hardworking men, women and children live here,” she said. “The families are vulnerable populations of Missouri’s disabled, elderly, working poor, single adults, single parents, couples and children. We ask that you make people, not property your priority.”

She pointed out that the city is already lacking affordable housing and that it would be very difficult for the residents to find another place to live, especially on short notice.

Some members of the crowd met Hussmann’s comments with applause and cheers. Mayor Darwin Hindman reminded them both were against council protocol.

Some park residents, such as Cindy Snowden, addressed the council directly.

“If they give me 120 days to move, I can’t do it,” Snowden said. She said that her trailer is too old to be moved and still comply with Boone County regulations.

Jason Shoot, Ron Netemeyer’s partner at Whirlwind Properties, said he was sympathetic to the concerns.

“I understand where everyone is coming from,” Shoot said. “You can’t predict what is going to happen, but we don’t have any plans right now.”

Many council members said they believed what Shoot was saying, but they wanted written proof.

“It’s easy to say, but if you don’t have it in black and white, then they are the ones stuck,” First Ward Councilwoman Almeta Crayton said, speaking of the residents.

Fourth Ward Councilman Jerry Wade agreed.

A verbal agreement isn’t binding, he said: “It doesn’t work unless there is an enforceable commitment.”

While Shoot said he understood the concern, he wasn’t willing to agree to any specifics as far as a long-term time line for eviction or relocation aid program, but he said he would consider the possibilities.

Fifth Ward Councilwoman Laura Nauser had some issues with the latter request.

“I am just not comfortable with council sitting here and saying ‘You need to come up with some sort of payment (to residents) or we won’t accept your annexation,’” she said.

The council will review the application again in August after Netemeyer and Shoot have time to discuss options with city staff.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Janet Hamilton July 3, 2007 | 10:00 a.m.

As a resident of a mobile home within Columbia's city limits, proud of my ownership of my home, enjoying the independence of my own place, unable to afford a house, educated, working, and partaking of Columbia's attractions, I am uneasy about the moneyed developments around our town. I enjoy my neighbors in our park, feel we are part of the cultural diversity, white, black, olive, brown, that enriches the community. I would hope the City Council would find enough value in our smaller communities to want to protect them from possible extinction.

My question is, if not in a mobile home park, where would you have us live?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.