State Supreme Court finds location not essential for convictions

Tuesday, November 20, 2007 | 10:18 p.m. CST; updated 11:56 a.m. CDT, Saturday, July 19, 2008

JEFFERSON CITY — The Missouri Supreme Court decided Tuesday that prosecutors do not have to prove where a crime happened to win a conviction.

The ruling came in the case of a man convicted of raping his stepdaughter in St. Louis.

On appeal, Leonard Taylor argued that his conviction should be overturned because the judge did not allow his attorney to argue that prosecutors had not proved the rape occurred in the city rather than St. Louis County.

The Supreme Court said in a unanimous opinion that the venue where an offense occurred is not subject to the same element of proof during trial as the crime itself.

Taylor’s attorney had claimed that the standard jury instructions approved by the Supreme Court require prosecutors to prove, as an element of the offense, that a crime occurred in the county where the trial is held.

But the Supreme Court essentially struck down its own jury instructions. The court noted that the law making rape a crime does not require the location to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

A trial generally does occur in the county where a crime occurred, unless a defendant asks for it to be moved elsewhere.

But prior court decisions have created “the misconception that proper venue is a prerequisite for a valid judgment,” Judge Michael Wolff wrote in Tuesday’s decision.

If a defendant believes the trial is being held in the wrong county, he or she should ask a judge to move the case elsewhere. But an objection to the trial location cannot wait until the trial already has begun, the court said.

Taylor was convicted of a rape that occurred in July 2000 in a vehicle in the parking lot of an abandoned store, though the victim did not tell police about it until December 2004, according to court documents.

Police drove around the city and county with the victim, asking her to try to identify the location where the incident occurred. At trial, the victim did not identify a specific place but testified that the rape did occur in St. Louis.


Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.