Action group urges Columbia to repeal smoking ban

Wednesday, December 19, 2007 | 7:57 p.m. CST; updated 5:05 a.m. CDT, Monday, July 21, 2008

COLUMBIA — The Boone Liberty Coalition, whose members fought a losing battle against Columbia’s smoking ban, has sent a formal request to the mayor and other members of the City Council asking that they repeal the ban and replace it with a new ordinance.

The alternative plan, modeled after the “Gregali bill” that the coalition said was considered in St. Louis, would require businesses to post signs stating whether they prohibit, allow or restrict smoking in their establishments. The coalition sent the proposal to the council on Monday.

The idea isn’t likely to go far, though, given the initial reaction from council members.

“That’s totally not sufficient,” Sixth Ward Councilwoman Barbara Hoppe said. “It’s like a restaurant posting they aren’t following sanitary codes.”

Hoppe added: “I see it as a health issue.”

Mayor Darwin Hindman has been steadfast in his support of the smoking ban, repeatedly saying that concerns for the public health trump those about the economy. Third Ward Councilman Karl Skala has said the same.

On Wednesday, Fourth Ward Councilman Jerry Wade said he’d be surprised if the council would vote to repeal the ban. Fifth Ward Councilwoman Laura Nauser predicted the coalition’s request would go nowhere.

“I don’t think there is political will on the council at this time to repeal,” Nauser said.

Members of the Boone Liberty Coalition could not be reached for comment, but their letter to the council outlined several rationale for their proposal. They noted the recent closings of several bars and restaurants whose owners blamed the smoking ban for lost business and said those closings have resulted in lost jobs for working-class citizens. They also claimed that “the health impacts of secondhand smoke are minimal at best.”

The letter also references a recent study by Michael Pakko of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. He found that the smoking ban is responsible for a 5 percent decline in sales tax revenue from Columbia dining establishments.

“There may be some problems with separating tax dollars from restaurants and the smoking ban itself,” said Skala said in reference to the report.

The letter comes on the heels of failed petition attempt to force a repeal of the smoking ban onto a citywide ballot. Petitioners submitted thousands of signatures to the city clerk, but many were found to be invalid and the petition fell short. While supporters of the petition drive pledged to appeal to the council to put the matter on the ballot anyway, they never came forward.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Michael Vaughn December 20, 2007 | 12:42 p.m.

It's seems to me the the city council wants the local bars and restaurants to fail in this city. The question is how many more bars and restaurants have to close before the city council admits that maybe they made a mistake. Alcohol has just as many dangers as smoking but you don't see them taking that away. Have you ever heard of someone having an accident because they were smoking? I think not. Smokers pay taxes just like everyone else. Smoking is a choice just like not smoking and it is not fair that a smokers rights don't count. With the city councils decision it is clear that the business owner has not rights either since they can't run their business as they want.

(Report Comment)
Allan Sharrock December 20, 2007 | 4:33 p.m.

I think it is time to elect some new officials. I am a non-smoker but I believe in personal property rights. It is a luxury to go out and eat or drink. Therefore you have the power of choice not to go to a place the allows smoking. It is also your choice on where you work. Maybe we should send our officials a bill for the lost taxes.

(Report Comment)
Mohammad Chughtai December 21, 2007 | 8:19 a.m.

My honest opinion is that the restaurants should have the right to be smoking or not smoking. Smoking is not “ILLEGAL” like drugs. So my reasoning is if they want to ban it in restaurant they should ban it everywhere and make it illegal. You don’t see alcohol bans because at restaurants. Customers have to bars to drink shouldn’t alcohol be banned next? Regarding the effect on employees, if an employee knows that the business is a smoking establishment and the employee can’t stand to be there, THEN DON’T WORK THERE. Imagine a teacher that loves to teach but hates kids. Are they going to take all the kids out of her class if the only class she wants to teach is 2nd grade? It doesn’t make sense. Give the power to the people that run the businesses BEFORE THEY SUE THE CITY because they lost their business because of the ban. Then everyone will have to pay for the bad decisions of our decision makers.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.