We know they invented...
The Egyptians invented the 365 day calendar, which they split up into 12 months. They also invented the sundial, which helped them to break down the day into morning, afternoon and night.
The Egyptians are credited with inventing scissors, hair combs, the toothbrush and toothpaste, and cosmetics. Other tools include the lock and key, the loom, oil lamps and the drum.
The Egyptians created board games for recreation. The most popular were Senet and Jackals, each player receiving 5 or more pawns, similar to checkers. They also invented the Ouija board, used to tell the future.
The Egyptians developed an advanced math and organized science system. They invented math to measure time, count money, and to build the pyramids. Some classifications they invented include geometry, calculus, astronomy and botany.
But did they also influence Christianity?
A long time ago, a man was born of a virgin in the likeness of God. After spreading messages of love and peace in his early life, he was betrayed by his friends and slain on a slab of wood. He was then resurrected on Earth before returning to heaven.
The man’s name isn’t Jesus. It’s Osiris, the god-man of ancient Egypt.
Didn’t hear this in Bible study? No wonder; Osiris is thought to have lived a good 2,500 years before Jesus’ birth. Although the significance of Osiris, who was considered “god of the dead,” paled in comparison to that of Christ’s, the two men’s stories are strikingly similar.
It’s not by accident, said Lisa Ann Bargeman, author of a new book, “The Egyptian Origins of Christianity.”
Bargeman asserts that many Christian rituals and beliefs, specifically Roman Catholic ones, may have come from ancient Egyptian tradition. Her book juxtaposes the Bible with the Egyptian sacred text, The Book of the Dead, using specific themes and ceremonial practices to argue that Christianity directly evolved from the Egyptians.
One telling piece of evidence, Bargeman says, is the Christian use of the word “Amen,” which is a derivative of Amon, the Egyptian god of reproduction and life.
“For literally an eternity, human beings have been addressing their gods in the same way,” Bargeman said via e-mail.
Although others, most notably the religious scholar and theological historian Martin A. Larson, have made the same connection between Christianity and ancient Egyptian myths, most Christians are unaware of the similarities. While there are many clues to suggest Christianity’s roots can be traced to Greek, or Hellenic times, which began about 300 years before Christ’s birth during the development of Judaism, stories about Egyptian influences and other perceived “pagan” legends make some Christians uneasy.
“The reason for such denial is that Christianity is always presented as the only true religion, the only way to salvation, and as such, it could not have borrowed anything from a religion they have dubbed heathen or pagan,” Harrison Ola Akingbade, an Anglican Christian himself, wrote in the foreword of Bargeman’s book.
Bargeman first recognized the correlation between Christendom and Egyptian history when she heard a college professor suggest that Christianity was rooted in a ritual more ancient than popular culture believed. The story of Adam and Eve’s fall from grace, for example, has correlations to the Egyptian legend of Re and Sekhmet, another couple prideful in the face of God who punished them for their sins.
Other links between Egyptian religious practice and Christianity include the Trinity. When Christians say “In the name of the Father, the Son and of the Holy Spirit,” they mean, according to Bargeman, “in the name of Khnum-Atum/Aten-Re-Ptah, Osiris-Horus, and of Min/Amen.”
Not quite as catchy, but the ancient Egyptian gods assumed the same identities — father, son and spirit — that Christians worship.
Akingbade, an African scholar who discussed the Egyptian and Christian correlations as an undergraduate student in Nigeria, said among scholars, these similarities are nothing new.
“We’ve been talking about this forever,” he said. “Instead of talking about it in classes like I did, [Bargeman] made sense of it.”
Others, however, argue that not even the Greeks and Romans had much influence on Christianity, and that an attempt to bring the ancient Egyptian into the discussion is misguided. Larry Hurtado, professor of the New Testament at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland, considers the Egyptian influence on Christianity trifling.
“The most immediate culture or matrix is that of Palestinian-Jewish people of that time and setting,” Hurtado said in an e-mail. “Identifiably Egyptian influence is negligible.”
Bargeman’s thesis has already been exhausted, Hurtado said.
“This is actually quite a tiresome aspect of being a scholar in my field, that books keep appearing with the author and uninformed readers breathlessly announcing its radicality and novelty, when time after time it is simply a re-tread of an idea or claim refuted long ago,” Hurtado said.
But despite the challenges from some historians, including those who take issue with Bargeman’s interpretations of some Egyptian symbols, she said she has received little criticism from Christians themselves.
“If you are a firm believer in Christ, then use the Egyptian religion as a modifier for what you currently believe,” she said. “Perhaps you can use the story of the eternal regeneration of Khepri — a baby and a god in one unified state of constant reawakening — at Christmas, and relate it to your Christian ceremonies. Or you can watch a beautiful heron, lake side, fly up to the sky, carrying with it the wistful idea of our soul-ba as Benu-bird, the heron-esque spirit.”
Although Bargeman’s thesis has been debated by Egyptologists for some time now, Akingbade said Bargeman’s book is important to understanding and acknowledging Egyptian history. He has purchased several copies for his Christian friends in Africa.
“Most of my friends said it was really good,” Akingbade said. “It’s a contribution to scholarship.”
E-mail
Print
Comments
Hi Author
I have been researching this issue for a short while and I tend to believe that the Egyptians have had a greater influence on Christianity.
My reason are that
In the Old Testament Genesis claims to be the beginning of time and an actual date has been associated with this beginning (ie 4000bc). Egyptian History goes back before this history and written(Hieroglyphs) are much older than any Christian or Judaic writing.
The main patriarch Abraham,Jacob(ISRAEL) Moses etc in the Bible have little or no evidence to substantiate their existence but the Egyptian contempories do. There is now a wide belief that the Patriarch were originally Egyptian Pharoahs and their personalities were used by the Later Hebrews to develop their religious myths.
If the Old Testament prohesised the coming of Christ by the method he came, one would believe that as the Christians believe that this is the only way to God that Virgin Births, Floods would not have happened to great people previous to Christianity. There is a book called the "16 Crucified Saviours" which identifies this concept throughtout history on many an occasion. This means that if true, either Christianities saviour is not that or important or that is contempories are even more important.
Through the new and the Old Testament the place called Egypt and Ethiopia are mentioned more than any other Places. If these seat within Africa had no significance in the develoment of Christianity why have they been named so often.
Also Why was it that when in need it is always to Egypt that message is sent for help or the people themselves travel to Egypt to avoid capture by the Romans.
Finally, if yo make a study of old maps of Africa you will find that Ethiopia relates to a vast piece of Land south of Egypt that coveres africa from East to west. a simple bit of research will show that the Atlantic ocean that borders west Africa was called the Ethiopian Sea right up unit at least 1700's. When the Bible states people married Ethiopians and Egyptians they are speaking of Black People
Many academics do not want the link between Africa, Egypt and Ethiopia expanded upon as this will destroy the myth of White Superiority but African poeple who are putting forward this position are not doing so as a means of pushing Black Superiority but to contest the notion that we have not contributed in the developments of mankind
Yours truly
Leslie Davis
Nottingham
England
P.E.A.C.E. Proper Education Always Corrects Errors
When a tedious comparative analysis is conducted between the ancient Kemetic system and the Christian scheme, there is no doubt that there are absolute analogies, which have been pointed out long before Bargemann's conclusions.
The problem is not whether or not the ancient Kemetic system is the parent of Christianity, as an established so-called religion. It lies with the fact that Christians have not accepted the reality of an ancient Afrikan way of life, as the roots of what they wholeheartedly believe.
After having been led to believe that Afrikan worship was pagan, it turns out that if one is the parent of the other, then the child msut also have been pagan as well. But, there are those of us who know better than to believe in the old white supremacist notion that Afrikan worship is pagan.
I'd challenge anyone on this discussion board to do a comparative analysis and prove otherwise. There are a whole host of names and terms in the Bible that can also be traced back to their ancient Kemetic roots.
Only the truth can stand any form of scrutiny, not beliefs.
P.E.A.C.E.