Gonzales sees GOP support erode further

Three GOP senators question the attorney general’s credibility
Monday, March 26, 2007 | 12:00 a.m. CDT; updated 6:13 a.m. CDT, Sunday, July 20, 2008

WASHINGTON — Republican support for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales eroded Sunday as three key senators sharply questioned his honesty over last fall’s firings of eight federal prosecutors. Additionally, two Democrats joined the list of lawmakers calling for Gonzales’ ouster.

Several Republicans also urged President Bush to allow sworn testimony from his top aides about their role in dismissing the U.S. attorneys — a standoff threatening to result in Capitol Hill subpoenas of White House officials.

The embattled attorney general was facing the toughest test of his two-year tenure at the Justice Department with the release of documents suggesting he was more involved with the firings than he indicated earlier.

Democrats have accused the Justice Department and the White House of purging the prosecutors for political reasons. The Bush administration maintains the firings were not improper because U.S. attorneys are political appointees.

Stopping short of demanding Gonzales’ resignation, Sen. Arlen Specter cited a Nov. 27 calendar entry placing the attorney general at a Justice Department meeting to discuss the dismissals. Those documents “appear to contradict” Gonzales’ earlier statements that he never participated in such conversations, said Specter, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee that oversees the Justice Department.

“We have to have an attorney general who is candid, truthful. And if we find out he has not been candid and truthful, that’s a very compelling reason for him not to stay on,” said Specter, R-Pa.

Specter said he would wait until Gonzales’ scheduled April 17 testimony to the committee before deciding whether he could continue to support the attorney general. He called it a “make or break” appearance.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Gonzales has been “wounded” by the firings. “He has said some things that just don’t add up,” said Graham, who also is on the Senate Judiciary panel. And Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., said the Justice Department has continually changed its story about the dismissals.

“You cannot have the nation’s chief law enforcement officer with a cloud hanging over his credibility,” Hagel said.

At the same time, Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein of California and Bill Nelson of Florida said Gonzales should step down.

“The nation is not well served by this,” said Feinstein, whose state had two U.S. attorneys fired in the purge — in San Diego and San Francisco. Nelson said Gonzales should resign because he has “lost his credibility” but added: “I think we ought to go through the procedures and hear what he says.”

At a March 13 news conference, trying to stem the furor over the firings, Gonzales said, “I never saw documents. We never had a discussion about where things stood.”

But his Nov. 27 schedule, included in a batch of memos sent to Capitol Hill late Friday, showed he attended an hour-long meeting at which, aides said, he approved a detailed plan for executing the purge.

Since the schedule’s release, Justice aides have said Gonzales meant he was not involved in selecting the prosecutors when he said he didn’t participate in discussions about their firings. “He didn’t say he wasn’t involved,” former Republican chairman Ed Gillespie said Sunday.

Gonzales has said he relied heavily on his former chief of staff, Kyle Sampson, to orchestrate the dismissals. E-mails show Sampson, who resigned under fire March 12, considering whether prosecutors were “loyal Bushies” as one factor in demanding their resignations.

Sampson is scheduled to appear Thursday before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Leahy’s committee has authorized subpoenas for presidential political adviser Karl Rove and other top White House staff linked to the firings. Bush wants his aides to be interviewed in private sessions and without being placed under oath.

Specter and Hagel have joined Democrats in rejecting the president’s offer, while Graham and Lott said lawmakers should take it. “If you start subpoenaing the advisers to the president ... you’re going to go to court,” Graham said.

Three of the ousted U.S. attorneys Sunday said they have concluded their firings were politically motivated.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

The Quad
advertisements