Bill would open future Missouri adoption records

Sunday, January 31, 2010 | 12:01 a.m. CST

JEFFERSON CITY — Adoptees are urging Missouri lawmakers to grant them greater access to their birth and medical records, casting their cause in terms of the civil rights movement.

Currently adoptees born in Missouri must go through the court system or get consent from their birth mother to get their official birth certificate.

Lawmakers are considering a bill that would allow some adopted after Aug. 28 total access to their birth and medical records once they turn 18. The bill would also give birth parents the choice of whether they want to be contacted by their adult child or to communicate through a third party.

People adopted before Aug. 28 would only have access to available medical history. The state registrar would still have to attempt to contact the birth mother for permission to release the original birth certificate.

Every other Missouri citizen has complete access to their birth certificate, said the bill's sponsor, Sen. Rita Heard Days.

"People who are adopted should not be a separate class of people," Days, D-St. Louis, said.

For $15, Missourians can obtain a birth certificate through the state Division of Vital Statistics or through their local health department. Adoptees have to get permission before they can get access.

Missouri is one of 26 states to require a court order for adoptees to get access to their original birth certificate. Four states — Alabama, Alaska, Maine and Oregon— allow adult adoptees to request their records. Twenty other states stipulate some form of consent or eligibility requirements.

"We are made second-class citizens for something we adoptees had nothing to do with," adult adoptee Bob Haight said during a Senate health committee hearing earlier this week. "I'm 60 years old, they are in their 80s, if they die before signing an affidavit I have no proof I was ever born."

Supporters say having access to medical records could give adoptees the chance to prepare for genetic medical problems.

Ann Padmos told the committee that when she gave her baby up for adoption at age 19 she didn't know she would get breast cancer twice or that she would become diabetic. Padmos said she eventually reconnected with her son, and now he has the opportunity to warn his daughters of the family history.

The bill would give birth parents the option of filling out a report that would list chronic diseases, allergies and other medical information.

Similar legislation has been proposed in both chambers for several years, but has not made it past the committee level.

Tyler McClay, a spokesman for the Missouri Catholic Conference, said child placement agencies are better suited to reconnecting parents and adopted children.

The current Department of Social Services adoption registry does not have the same resources as the agencies, he said.

The state registry connects adoptees with their birth families if both parties request it. Less than 50 people a year reconnect with family members this way, according to the department.

McClay said he supports a House bill that lets adult adoptees request a copy of their birth certificate and lets child placement agencies attempt to contact the birth parents.

Days said it can cost up to $500 to have a private child placement agency do the search, and it is less expensive for the state to charge adoptees for making the inquiries.

 

»Contact an editor with corrections or additional information

Comments

Karen Belanger February 1, 2010 | 9:39 a.m.

Adoptees should have the same rights as the every other citizen of this country the right to our original birth certificate. Do not continue to penalize the children and future adults you are trying to "protect". If we teach our children to tell the truth then first we must tell it to them.

(Report Comment)
Heather Dodd February 6, 2010 | 8:40 a.m.

Thank you Karen! Honesty is the best policy. My mother was "protected" by the state from her siblings. Fortunately, we were able to do some detective work over a span of many years and find her siblings. I'm still trying to figure out what they were protecting her from. They were adopted when there mom passed away. It's not like they were taken away because of abuse or drugs or anything. Many of the adoptees who cannot get there information were put up for adoption due to their mothers undying love for them. Many birth parents are and were faced with this decision due to lack of income. Is that a crime, do we need to protect adopted adults from having their natural family because the family was disadvantaged?

Yes it is true that not all reunions end on a happy note, but most of them do. For the ones that don't, they are adults who can decide for themselves if they want to continue contact with their natural family. Just like those of us who grew up with our natural family and decide who to keep in touch with.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! You can comment below. (Click here to register.) Please be civil and refrain from profanities and name-calling; in other words, don't say anything you wouldn't otherwise say in public. If you see something objectionable, please tell us which comment and why it should be removed. Your real name is required to register and your first and last name will be published with every comment. Read the full comment policy here.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements