The Kansas City boulevard named for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. will once again be called The Paseo.

Kansas City’s voters made that decision Tuesday. We wanted to keep King’s name on the street, but the verdict at the polls was overwhelming and clear.

Now what?

Quiet reflection is a good first step. The campaign for and against the King name became aggressive in its final days, which was unfortunate.

Both sides should take some time now to let tempers cool, while seeking additional clarity about the message voters intended to send.

Most Kansas Citians have not rejected King. Even supporters of Save The Paseo, the group that lobbied against the King name, agreed the city should do something significant and permanent to remember the civil rights leader. That goal shouldn’t change.

After a cooling-off period, Mayor Quinton Lucas should lead an effort to re-examine the issue.

Honoring King’s memory can’t just hinge on a better campaign or improved public relations. A deeper, complicated conversation about how Kansas City can move forward is needed.

That may mean renaming a street. Several options have been offered, and the city will want to consider them.

But renaming a boulevard or an avenue may not be the only option, or the best. The community should be invited to propose new alternatives. It’s possible that some neighborhoods will step forward to ask for King’s name on a street or nearby public land.

This week, Lucas suggested enhancements to the existing Martin Luther King Jr. city park. That, too, is a possibility.

Whatever the choices, Lucas and his City Council colleagues must do a much better job of reaching out to affected homeowners and businesses before any future name changes are approved. In some cases, the city might consider providing financial assistance for those affected.

The debate over King’s name on The Paseo was too long and too disruptive. The East Side ministers and activists who first proposed the change were insensitive to the needs of residents, tarnishing the effort from the beginning.

They should now step back and let the people of Kansas City figure it out. While it might take some time, an inclusive process will help the city avoid a continuation of this sad chapter in its political life.

Copyright The Kansas City Star. Reprinted with permission.


About opinions in the Missourian: The Missourian’s Opinion section is a public forum for the discussion of ideas. The views presented in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Missourian or the University of Missouri. If you would like to contribute to the Opinion page with a response or an original topic of your own, visit our submission form.

Recommended for you

Join the conversation

When posting comments, please follow our community guidelines:
• Login with a social account on WorldTable.
• Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language or engage in personal attacks.
• Stay on topic. Don’t hijack a forum to talk about something else or to post spam.
• Abuse of the community could result in being banned.
• Comments on our website and social media may be published in our newspaper or on our website.