The First Amendment to the Constitution speaks to three things: freedom of and from religion; freedom of speech and the press; and the freedom to peaceably assemble and to petition the government for redress of grievances.

These freedoms come with their own restrictions as well. We cannot violate other laws while practicing our beliefs; we cannot intentionally publish falsehoods or yell “Fire!” in a crowded room; and we cannot riot in the streets to make a political point.

What we can do is openly complain about our government and the influences of political organizations, committees and lobbyists on our political system. We should be able to do this without consideration of our religion, political affiliation or social standing. This is why I am questioning the actions taken by senior congressional leaders against Minnesota freshmen Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar.

Like a lot of Americans, I recognize Israel’s right to be a sovereign nation and its people the ability to live in peace. I also recognize the difference between the people of Israel and the Israeli government; the Palestinian people and the Palestinian government. It is the governmental policies with which I have a problem.

I also have a problem with the influence of money being spent by political committees and lobbyists for our politicians and political system.

This is why, as many of you, I voted for the Clean Missouri Amendment last year. This is why I am fighting the Supreme Court decision on Citizens United versus the Federal Election Commission.

It is time we get big money out of politics.

This brings me to the plight of Rep. Omar. She and Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., are the first two Muslim women to be voted into Congress. Omar believes that “a lot of our Jewish colleagues, a lot of our constituents, a lot of our allies, (think) that everything we say about Israel (is) anti-Semitic because we are Muslim.”

What she wants is a reasonable debate concerning the plight of the Palestinian people and the actions taken by the Israeli government against them.

This is a result of her criticizing the American Israel Public Affairs Committee for their influence over members of Congress. AIPAC is a lobbying organization whose mission “is to strengthen, protect and promote the U.S.-Israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the United States and Israel.”

AIPAC is a 501(c)(4) organization and donations to AIPAC are not tax deductible. A 501(c)(4) organization “may engage in an unlimited amount of lobbying, provided that the lobbying is related to the organization's exempt purpose.” However, A 501(c)(4) may not contribute to a political candidate’s campaign.

AIPAC is not only supported by many American Jews, but also by many evangelical Christians who see the return of Israel as part of their religious prophecy. Because of the influence of these two constituencies, AIPAC holds a lot of political power in the U.S.

Omar criticized that influence because it is preventing a meaningful debate concerning the humanitarian, political and military situations in Israel. Because she criticized a Jewish organization and because she is a Muslim, she has been labeled anti-Semitic.

In support of her criticism of AIPAC, several hundred influential Jews signed an open letter. It reads in part:

“There is absolutely nothing anti-Semitic about calling out the noxious role of AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee), which spends millions each year to buy U.S. political support for Israeli aggression and militarism against the Palestinian people … (AIPAC) has played an outsized role in producing nearly unanimous congressional support for Israel … To point out this reality is not anti-Semitism.

“We thank Ilhan Omar for having the bravery to shake up the congressional taboo against criticizing Israel. As Jews with a long tradition of social justice and anti-racism, AIPAC does not represent us.”

So where is the line to be drawn between criticism of Israel for over influence in politics and an anti-Semitic statement? When is public or private speech a violation of the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause?

It really depends on the statement and the listener to determine if the line has been crossed.

Omar voicing her concern for plight of the Palestinian people is not anti-Semitism; it is true patriotism to point out the influence of unbridled money in American politics.


About opinions in the Missourian: The Missourian’s Opinion section is a public forum for the discussion of ideas. The views presented in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Missourian or the University of Missouri. If you would like to contribute to the Opinion page with a response or an original topic of your own, visit our submission form.

David Rosman is an editor, writer and professional speaker. You can read more of David’s commentaries at ColumbiaMissourian.com and InkandVoice.com.

Recommended for you

Join the conversation

When posting comments, please follow our community guidelines:
• Login with a social account on WorldTable.
• Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language or engage in personal attacks.
• Stay on topic. Don’t hijack a forum to talk about something else or to post spam.
• Abuse of the community could result in being banned.
• Comments on our website and social media may be published in our newspaper or on our website.