On July 1, President Trump said he’d increase deportations of undocumented immigrants, starting after the Fourth of July.

This led to widespread advice to people perhaps vulnerable to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, called ICE: “Lock your doors” and demand search warrants.

On July 12, “Lights for Liberty” events occurred nationwide. Protesters consider activities of ICE truly chilling. Reports of roundups began on July 14. And on July 22, President Trump said that his administration would expand fast-track deportations and strengthen ICE.

Roundups and deportations have occurred before in the United States. This country, for example, did roundups and deportations roughly a century ago, but the circumstances were much different.

Between 1919 and 1921, U.S. Attorney General Alexander Mitchell Palmer and his Department of Justice joined with Immigration and Naturalization Services in rounding up somewhere between 3,000 and 10,000 suspected Communists, Socialists and anarchists (estimates vary) in 33 cities.

J. Edgar Hoover was in charge of the Justice Department’s Bureau of Intelligence. Eight cities had suffered bombings. One bomb damaged Attorney General Palmer’s home in Washington, D.C.

Over 550 people rounded up in the “Palmer Raids” got deported. These nearly century-old deportations occurred as part of the “red scare.” Views of Communists and Socialists struck the powers-that-be as too radical to be permitted.

Now it’s undocumented immigrants who face deportation, and some Americans fear this is part of a “brown scare.”

Unfortunately, President Trump’s undisciplined tweets are helping fuel fear that racism is providing some of the current impetus for deportations. He’s attacking four congresswomen — Ayanna Pressley, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib — whom he considers too radical. Collectively, the four have been dubbed “the Squad.”

Some pundits theorize that Trump’s anti-Squad Twitterfests are a diversionary tactic: Get the media to focus attention on his Squad-taunting. The more time the media spends on Trump’s rants against the four congresswomen, the less time it will have to spend on, say, Trump’s relationship with billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who’s in jail awaiting trial on charges of sex crimes with under-aged females, or on Robert Mueller’s appearance on Capitol Hill.

But the primary problem with Trump’s anti-Squad tweets is that they add weight to the viewpoint that President Trump is a racist. Of all the vile categories used to separate people into groups that are acceptable or unacceptable, race is one of the most pernicious, if not the most pernicious.

Rank-ordering of the most vile forms of discrimination is not the goal here. Clearly, discrimination on the basis of race or ethnicity goes against the grain of the American ideal, an ideal that is still unachieved and perhaps undergoing setbacks as a result of Trump’s rhetoric.

Trump’s undisciplined use of Twitter included his telling the four congresswomen to “go back” to their countries. He tweeted on July 14:

Three of the four congresswomen were born here. Ilhan Omar, from Somalia, became a citizen in 2000. The U.S. Constitution requires that representatives have “been seven Years a Citizen of the United States.”

On July 16, the House of Representatives passed a “RESOLUTION Condemning President Trump’s racist comments directed at Members of Congress.”

It contains 16 “whereas” clauses, with statements on immigration that include “immigration of people from all over the Earth has defined every stage of American history” and “the commitment to immigration and asylum has been not a partisan cause but a powerful national value that has infused the work of many Presidents.”


About opinions in the Missourian: The Missourian’s Opinion section is a public forum for the discussion of ideas. The views presented in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Missourian or the University of Missouri. If you would like to contribute to the Opinion page with a response or an original topic of your own, visit our submission form.

The resolution also invokes former presidents Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Franklin D. Roosevelt and John Kennedy, with Benjamin Franklin and Alexander Hamilton included for good measure.

The resolution declares that “ the Founders conceived America as a haven of refuge for people fleeing from religious and political persecution....”

But what about President Trump? According to the resolution, “President Donald Trump’s racist comments have legitimized fear and hatred of new Americans and people of color.”

Pointedly, the resolution ends by saying that it “strongly condemns” his “referring to immigrants and asylum seekers as ‘invaders.’” And it emphasized and condemned the factual errors made by the president when he said that “immigrants, and those who may look to the President like immigrants, should ‘go back’ to other countries” and that “Members of Congress who are immigrants (or those of our colleagues who are wrongly assumed to be immigrants) do not belong in Congress or in the United States of America.”

Four Republicans joined the Democrats for a vote of 240 to 187 in favor of the resolution. Did this stop Trump’s attacks on the Squad? Of course not. The next day, July 17, he called the Squad members out by name at a rally in Greenville, North Carolina. He drilled down a laundry list of things he said Rep. Omar did.

Among other things, he said she “smeared U.S. service members involved in Blackhawk Down,” said that Al-Quaida made her “proud,” and “blamed the United States for the crisis in Venezuela.”

After he told the crowd that “Omar has a history of launching vicious anti-Semitic screeds,” he then stood silent for 13 seconds while the crowd chanted “send her back.”

Later, Trump falsely claimed he tried to stop the chanting, although the video was there to set the record straight.

Did the House resolution at least slow down Trump’s Twitterfest against the Squad? Not a bit. On July 21, he tweeted:

On July 22, he doubled down, tweeting:

This “not very smart” comment echoes his “low IQ” comment about African-American Congresswoman Maxine Waters, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee.

Roughly a year ago, on July 24, 2018, Trump said, “Instead of supporting our ICE officers, many of these Democrat politicians who are, really, disciples of a very low IQ person, Maxine Waters, and perhaps even worse, Nancy Pelosi, they’ve launched vicious smears on the brave men and women who defend our communities.”

The next day, Rep. Waters corrected the record, saying: “I’ve never said a word about abolishing ICE.” But she has criticized separating children from their families.

Oh, my. To help solve our immigration problem and improve racial relations, we need a big-hearted, fact-loving genius for president — preferably one who eschews Twitter.

Sandy Davidson, Ph.D., J.D., teaches communications law at the MU School of Journalism.

Recommended for you

Join the conversation

When posting comments, please follow our community guidelines:
• Login with a social account on WorldTable.
• Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language or engage in personal attacks.
• Stay on topic. Don’t hijack a forum to talk about something else or to post spam.
• Abuse of the community could result in being banned.
• Comments on our website and social media may be published in our newspaper or on our website.